These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30402075)

  • 21. Sexual selection.
    Andersson M; Iwasa Y
    Trends Ecol Evol; 1996 Feb; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 21237761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The handicap process favors exaggerated, rather than reduced, sexual ornaments.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Sep; 68(9):2534-49. PubMed ID: 24837599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
    Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.
    Radwan J
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):113-27. PubMed ID: 17874278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends.
    Kokko H; Jennions MD; Houde A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1317-24. PubMed ID: 17360285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multiple Sexual Ornaments Coevolve with Multiple Mating Preferences.
    Brooks R; Couldridge V
    Am Nat; 1999 Jul; 154(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 29587499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mate-choice copying: Status quo and where to go.
    Witte K; Kniel N; Kureck IM
    Curr Zool; 2015 Dec; 61(6):1073-1081. PubMed ID: 32256543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. EVOLUTION OF CONDITION-DEPENDENT SEX ORNAMENTS AND MATING PREFERENCES: SEXUAL SELECTION BASED ON VIABILITY DIFFERENCES.
    Andersson M
    Evolution; 1986 Jul; 40(4):804-816. PubMed ID: 28556175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Secondary sexual ornamentation and non-additive genetic benefits of female mate choice.
    Reid JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1616):1395-402. PubMed ID: 17374595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Similar preferences for ornamentation in opposite- and same-sex choice experiments.
    Cardoso GC; Leitão AV; Funghi C; Batalha HR; Lopes RJ; Mota PG
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 27(12):2798-806. PubMed ID: 25371062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contrasting female mate preferences for red coloration in a fish.
    Reuland C; Culbert BM; Devigili A; Kahrl AF; Fitzpatrick JL
    Curr Zool; 2020 Aug; 66(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 32617091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sexually selected sexual selection: Can evolutionary retribution explain female ornamental colour?
    Méndez-Janovitz M; Gonzalez-Voyer A; Macías Garcia C
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Aug; 32(8):833-843. PubMed ID: 31070826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The evolution and significance of male mate choice.
    Edward DA; Chapman T
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2011 Dec; 26(12):647-54. PubMed ID: 21890230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sexual and non-sexual social preferences in male and female white-eyed bulbuls.
    Kabasakal B; Poláček M; Aslan A; Hoi H; Erdoğan A; Griggio M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5847. PubMed ID: 28724892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The sexual selection paradigm: have we overlooked other mechanisms in the evolution of male ornaments?
    Candolin U; Tukiainen I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Oct; 282(1816):20151987. PubMed ID: 26446811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.