These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30402547)

  • 1. New treatment method for pain and reduction of local anesthesia use in deep caries.
    Yun J; Shim YS; Park SY; An SY
    J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2018 Oct; 18(5):277-285. PubMed ID: 30402547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness of Carie-Care™, chemomechanical caries removal technique in primary teeth: randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Ghanem AY; Talaat DM; Essawy MM; Bakry N
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):882. PubMed ID: 37980471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of chemomechanical caries removal agents Papacarie(®) and Carie-Care™ in primary molars: An in vitro study.
    Sahana S; Vasa AA; Geddam D; Reddy VK; Nalluri S; Velagapudi N
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Apr; 6(Suppl 1):S17-22. PubMed ID: 27195222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Papacarie®, Carie-Care™, BRIX3000™ and conventional hand instrumentation for caries removal in primary teeth: a randomized control study.
    Gupta N; Marwah N; Nigam A; Vishwanathaiah S; Alessa N; Almeslet A; Alhakami K; Dawood T; Masha FM; Maganur PC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 May; 48(3):131-138. PubMed ID: 38755991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chemomechanical caries removal method versus mechanical caries removal methods in clinical and community-based setting: A comparative in vivo study.
    Kumar KVKS; Prasad MG; Sandeep RV; Reddy SP; Divya D; Pratyusha K
    Eur J Dent; 2016; 10(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 27403059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chemomechanical Caries Removal: A Review & Study of an Indigen-ously Developed Agent (Carie Care (TM) Gel) In Children.
    Venkataraghavan K; Kush A; Lakshminarayana C; Diwakar L; Ravikumar P; Patil S; Karthik S
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Aug; 5(4):84-90. PubMed ID: 24155626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the efficacies of two chemo-mechanical caries removal agents (2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel and brix 3000), in caries removal and patient cooperation: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Alkhouli MM; Al Nesser SF; Bshara NG; AlMidani AN; Comisi JC
    J Dent; 2020 Feb; 93():103280. PubMed ID: 31981604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Worldwide research trends on the use of chemical-mechanical caries removal products over the years: a critical review.
    Souza TF; Martins ML; Magno MB; Vicente-Gomila JM; Fonseca-Gonçalves A; Maia LC
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(6):869-883. PubMed ID: 35831699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth.
    Kotb RM; Abdella AA; El Kateb MA; Ahmed AM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 34(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 20297701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chemo-mechanical removal versus conventional removal for deep caries lesion.
    Zambrano-Achig P; Viteri-García A; Verdugo-Paiva F
    Medwave; 2022 Jan; 22(1):e8320. PubMed ID: 35100249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods.
    Nadanovsky P; Cohen Carneiro F; Souza de Mello F
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 11641575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antibacterial Activity of Two Chemomechanical Caries Removal Gels on Carious Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.
    Gulzar S; Arora R; Shah AH; Bhardwaj B; Abusalim G; Khalil HS; Wyne AH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 27965492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Carisolv system vs traditional rotating instruments for caries removal in the primary dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lai G; Lara Capi C; Cocco F; Cagetti MG; Lingström P; Almhöjd U; Campus G
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(8):569-80. PubMed ID: 25772193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Smear Layer Formation After Caries Removal Using Erbium Laser and Papain-Based Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal Agent: An In Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Dhanvijay A; Kubde R; Shenoi P; Badole G; Shahu S
    Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e47999. PubMed ID: 38034221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and Patient's Acceptance of Alternative Methods for Caries Removal-a Systematic Review.
    Cardoso M; Coelho A; Lima R; Amaro I; Paula A; Marto CM; Sousa J; Spagnuolo G; Marques Ferreira M; Carrilho E
    J Clin Med; 2020 Oct; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 33114249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of three different caries removal techniques in children: a comparative clinical study.
    Rajakumar S; Mungara J; Joseph E; Philip J; Shilpa Priya MP
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 38(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 24579278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SEM Analysis of Residual Dentin Surface in Primary Teeth Using Different Chemomechanical Caries Removal Agents.
    Thakur R; Patil SDS; Kush A; Madhu K
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(4):289-293. PubMed ID: 28650784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: A clinical and microbiological assessment - An
    Aswathi KK; Rani SP; Athimuthu A; Prasanna P; Patil P; Deepali KJ
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 28139476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Operative caries management in adults and children.
    Ricketts D; Lamont T; Innes NP; Kidd E; Clarkson JE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD003808. PubMed ID: 23543523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical and mechanical caries removal: status of the restorations at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
    Kirzioglu Z; Gurbuz T; Yilmaz Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 16969657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.