These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

802 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30403366)

  • 21. Clinical features and outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: early vs recent experience with impella.
    Singh H; Mehta RH; O'Neill W; Kapur NK; Lalonde T; Ohman M; Ghiu I; Chen-Hsing Y; Dutcheshen K; Schreiber T; Rosman H; Kaki A
    Am Heart J; 2021 Aug; 238():66-74. PubMed ID: 33848505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcome of the impella device for acute mechanical circulatory support.
    Lemaire A; Anderson MB; Prendergast T; Stockmaster N; Goodman A; Lozane AM; Batsides G
    Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 23571788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prediction of survival of patients in cardiogenic shock treated by surgically implanted Impella 5+ short-term left ventricular assist device.
    Nersesian G; Tschöpe C; Spillmann F; Gromann T; Roehrich L; Mueller M; Mulzer J; Starck C; Falk V; Schoenrath F; Potapov E
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Oct; 31(4):475-482. PubMed ID: 32879947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short-term mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière.
    Mastroianni C; Bouabdallaoui N; Leprince P; Lebreton G
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2017 Feb; 6(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 26873912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sex-Related Differences in Short-Term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Impella Support in Japan: From the J-PVAD Registry.
    Nakamura M; Imamura T; Ueno H; Kinugawa K; Investigators JP
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jun; 59(7):. PubMed ID: 37512020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal life support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: surgical venting versus Impella device.
    Radakovic D; Zittermann A; Knezevic A; Razumov A; Opacic D; Wienrautner N; Flottmann C; Rojas SV; Fox H; Schramm R; Morshuis M; Rudolph V; Gummert J; Deutsch MA
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2022 Jan; 34(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 34999807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Impella Microaxial Flow Catheter Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Myocarditis Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: An Analysis From the Global cVAD Registry.
    Annamalai SK; Esposito ML; Jorde L; Schreiber T; A Hall S; O'Neill WW; Kapur NK
    J Card Fail; 2018 Oct; 24(10):706-710. PubMed ID: 30244180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Percutaneous biventricular Impella support in therapy-refractory cardiogenic shock.
    Chiu CY; Hättasch R; Praeger D; Knebel F; Stangl K; Ramirez ID; Dreger H
    Heart Lung; 2018; 47(3):250-252. PubMed ID: 29628145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.
    Tarabichi S; Ikegami H; Russo MJ; Lee LY; Lemaire A
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):218. PubMed ID: 32795321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preliminary experience with Impella Recover(®) LP5.0 in nine patients with cardiogenic shock: a new circulatory support system in the intensive cardiac care unit.
    Bresson D; Sibellas F; Farhat F; Jegaden O; Kirkorian G; Bonnefoy E
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2011 Aug; 104(8-9):458-64. PubMed ID: 21944148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes Among Patients Transferred for Revascularization With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock from the cVAD Registry.
    O'Neill BP; Cohen MG; Basir MB; Schreiber T; Kapur NK; Dixon S; Khandelwal AK; Grines C; Ohman EM; O'Neill WW
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Apr; 123(8):1214-1219. PubMed ID: 30777319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Left Ventricular Unloading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Miyashita S; Banlengchit R; Marbach JA; Chweich H; Kawabori M; Kimmelstiel CD; Kapur NK
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jun; 39():28-35. PubMed ID: 34824038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Left ventricular unloading via percutaneous assist device during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest.
    Kieserman JM; Kuznetsov IA; Park J; Schurr JW; Toubat O; Olia S; Bermudez C; Cevasco M; Wald J
    Int J Artif Organs; 2024 Jun; 47(6):401-410. PubMed ID: 38853663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Outcomes of mechanical circulatory support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Kim Y; Shapero K; Ahn SS; Goldsweig AM; Desai N; Altin SE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):658-663. PubMed ID: 34156755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.
    Doshi R; Patel K; Decter D; Jauhar R; Meraj P
    Indian Heart J; 2018 Jul; 70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. PubMed ID: 30122245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data.
    Wernly B; Seelmaier C; Leistner D; Stähli BE; Pretsch I; Lichtenauer M; Jung C; Hoppe UC; Landmesser U; Thiele H; Lauten A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 108(11):1249-1257. PubMed ID: 30900010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Management and outcome of patients supported with Impella 5.0 for refractory cardiogenic shock.
    Gaudard P; Mourad M; Eliet J; Zeroual N; Culas G; Rouvière P; Albat B; Colson P
    Crit Care; 2015 Oct; 19():363. PubMed ID: 26453047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Saito Y; Tateishi K; Toda K; Matsumiya G; Kobayashi Y;
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 Sep; 12(17):e030819. PubMed ID: 37646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Jin C; Yandrapalli S; Yang Y; Liu B; Aronow WS; Naidu SS
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E98-E103. PubMed ID: 35100554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.