These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30403368)

  • 21. The Power of Attention: Using Eye Gaze to Predict Other-Regarding and Moral Choices.
    Ghaffari M; Fiedler S
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1878-1889. PubMed ID: 30295569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Time to Pay Attention? Information Search Explains Amplified Framing Effects Under Time Pressure.
    Roberts ID; Teoh YY; Hutcherson CA
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 33(1):90-104. PubMed ID: 34860637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of accentuation in the selection/rejection task framing effect.
    Chen J; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):543-568. PubMed ID: 28383992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Framing effects under cognitive load: the role of working memory in risky decisions.
    Whitney P; Rinehart CA; Hinson JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1179-84. PubMed ID: 19001587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can decision biases improve insurance outcomes? An experiment on status quo bias in health insurance choice.
    Krieger M; Felder S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2013 Jun; 10(6):2560-77. PubMed ID: 23783222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.
    Gluth S; Spektor MS; Rieskamp J
    Elife; 2018 Nov; 7():. PubMed ID: 30394874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Thinking Fast Increases Framing Effects in Risky Decision Making.
    Guo L; Trueblood JS; Diederich A
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Apr; 28(4):530-543. PubMed ID: 28406376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Noisy preferences in risky choice: A cautionary note.
    Bhatia S; Loomes G
    Psychol Rev; 2017 Oct; 124(5):678-687. PubMed ID: 28569526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of branding on preference-based decision making.
    Philiastides MG; Ratcliff R
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1208-15. PubMed ID: 23696199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Trait anxiety impairs cognitive flexibility when overcoming a task acquired response and a preexisting bias.
    Wilson CG; Nusbaum AT; Whitney P; Hinson JM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204694. PubMed ID: 30261023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accounting for the last-sampling bias in perceptual decision-making.
    Zhu T
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():105049. PubMed ID: 35131576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The neural basis of risky choice with affective outcomes.
    Suter RS; Pachur T; Hertwig R; Endestad T; Biele G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122475. PubMed ID: 25830918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Age-differences in cognitive flexibility when overcoming a preexisting bias through feedback.
    Wilson CG; Nusbaum AT; Whitney P; Hinson JM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 Aug; 40(6):586-594. PubMed ID: 29161963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of context on risk taking and decision times in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Sip KE; Muratore AF; Stern ER
    J Psychiatr Res; 2016 Apr; 75():82-90. PubMed ID: 26828371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Why Do Irrelevant Alternatives Matter? An fMRI-TMS Study of Context-Dependent Preferences.
    Chung HK; Sjöström T; Lee HJ; Lu YT; Tsuo FY; Chen TS; Chang CF; Juan CH; Kuo WJ; Huang CY
    J Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 37(48):11647-11661. PubMed ID: 29109242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neurobiological and memory models of risky decision making in adolescents versus young adults.
    Reyna VF; Estrada SM; DeMarinis JA; Myers RM; Stanisz JM; Mills BA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1125-42. PubMed ID: 21707215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Altering attentional control settings causes persistent biases of visual attention.
    Knight HC; Smith DT; Knight DC; Ellison A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):129-49. PubMed ID: 25801329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Decision-Making under Ambiguity Is Modulated by Visual Framing, but Not by Motor vs. Non-Motor Context. Experiments and an Information-Theoretic Ambiguity Model.
    Grau-Moya J; Ortega PA; Braun DA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153179. PubMed ID: 27124723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Framing effects in medical situations: distinctions of attribute, goal and risky choice frames.
    Peng J; Jiang Y; Miao D; Li R; Xiao W
    J Int Med Res; 2013 Jun; 41(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 23613497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attention in risky choice.
    Brandstätter E; Körner C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():166-76. PubMed ID: 25226548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.