These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30404170)

  • 1. Field Testing of the Use of Intake24-An Online 24-Hour Dietary Recall System.
    Rowland MK; Adamson AJ; Poliakov I; Bradley J; Simpson E; Olivier P; Foster E
    Nutrients; 2018 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 30404170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis.
    Foster E; Lee C; Imamura F; Hollidge SE; Westgate KL; Venables MC; Poliakov I; Rowland MK; Osadchiy T; Bradley JC; Simpson EL; Adamson AJ; Olivier P; Wareham N; Forouhi NG; Brage S
    J Nutr Sci; 2019; 8():e29. PubMed ID: 31501691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11-24 Year-Old.
    Bradley J; Simpson E; Poliakov I; Matthews JN; Olivier P; Adamson AJ; Foster E
    Nutrients; 2016 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 27294952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Iterative Development of an Online Dietary Recall Tool: INTAKE24.
    Simpson E; Bradley J; Poliakov I; Jackson D; Olivier P; Adamson AJ; Foster E
    Nutrients; 2017 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 28208763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating User Experiences and Preferred Features of a Web-Based 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool: Usability Study.
    Follong B; Haliburton C; Mackay S; Maiquez M; Grey J; Ni Mhurchu C
    JMIR Form Res; 2024 Oct; 8():e63823. PubMed ID: 39422998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of energy and nutrient intake estimation versus observed intake using 4 technology-assisted dietary assessment methods: a randomized crossover feeding study.
    Whitton C; Collins CE; Mullan BA; Rollo ME; Dhaliwal SS; Norman R; Boushey CJ; Delp EJ; Zhu F; McCaffrey TA; Kirkpatrick SI; Pollard CM; Healy JD; Hassan A; Garg S; Atyeo P; Mukhtar SA; Kerr DA
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2024 Jul; 120(1):196-210. PubMed ID: 38710447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting Perceived Problems in Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls: A Quantitative Think-Aloud Study Comparing Automated Self-Assisted 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24
    Mackenzie KM; Kerr DA; Whitton C; Talati Z; McCaffrey TA; Mullan BA
    Nutrients; 2022 Oct; 14(20):. PubMed ID: 36296964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Progressive 24-Hour Recall: Usability Study of Short Retention Intervals in Web-Based Dietary Assessment Surveys.
    Osadchiy T; Poliakov I; Olivier P; Rowland M; Foster E
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13266. PubMed ID: 32012055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing Reported Dietary Supplement Intakes between Two 24-Hour Recall Methods: The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool and the Interview-Administered Automated Multiple Pass Method.
    Pannucci TE; Thompson FE; Bailey RL; Dodd KW; Potischman N; Kirkpatrick SI; Alexander GL; Coleman LA; Kushi LH; Groesbeck M; Sundaram M; Clancy H; George SM; Kahle L; Subar AF
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Jun; 118(6):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 29803270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews.
    Wark PA; Hardie LJ; Frost GS; Alwan NA; Carter M; Elliott P; Ford HE; Hancock N; Morris MA; Mulla UZ; Noorwali EA; Petropoulou K; Murphy D; Potter GDM; Riboli E; Greenwood DC; Cade JE
    BMC Med; 2018 Aug; 16(1):136. PubMed ID: 30089491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance and Feasibility of Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool in Relation to Other Self-Report Tools and Biomarkers in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study.
    Subar AF; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Thompson FE; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Midthune D; Kipnis V; Kirkpatrick SI; Mittl B; Zimmerman TP; Douglass D; Bowles HR; Park Y
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Nov; 120(11):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 32819883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and Cost-effectiveness of Technology-Assisted Dietary Assessment Comparing the Automated Self-administered Dietary Assessment Tool, Intake24, and an Image-Assisted Mobile Food Record 24-Hour Recall Relative to Observed Intake: Protocol for a Randomized Crossover Feeding Study.
    Whitton C; Healy JD; Collins CE; Mullan B; Rollo ME; Dhaliwal SS; Norman R; Boushey CJ; Delp EJ; Zhu F; McCaffrey TA; Kirkpatrick SI; Atyeo P; Mukhtar SA; Wright JL; Ramos-García C; Pollard CM; Kerr DA
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2021 Dec; 10(12):e32891. PubMed ID: 34924357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Administering a combination of online dietary assessment tools, the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool, and Diet History Questionnaire II, in a cohort of adults in Alberta's Tomorrow Project.
    Solbak NM; Robson PJ; Lo Siou G; Al Rajabi A; Paek S; Vena JE; Kirkpatrick SI
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2021 Jul; 121(7):1312-1326. PubMed ID: 33612438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Subar AF; Douglass D; Zimmerman TP; Thompson FE; Kahle LL; George SM; Dodd KW; Potischman N
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2014 Jul; 100(1):233-40. PubMed ID: 24787491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Use of Digital Images in 24-Hour Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Douglass D; Zimmerman TP; Kahle LL; Thompson FE; George SM; Subar AF
    J Nutr; 2016 Dec; 146(12):2567-2573. PubMed ID: 27807039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing the cost of dietary assessment: self-completed recall and analysis of nutrition for use with children (SCRAN24).
    Foster E; Hawkins A; Delve J; Adamson AJ
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2014 Jan; 27 Suppl 1():26-35. PubMed ID: 23662627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between Self-Completed and Interviewer-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls in Cancer Survivors: Sampling Bias and Differential Reporting.
    Conway R; Heuchan G; Croker H; Esser S; Ireland V; Lally P; Beeken R; Fisher A
    Nutrients; 2022 Dec; 14(24):. PubMed ID: 36558396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of the Oxford WebQ, a low-cost, web-based method for assessment of previous 24 h dietary intakes in large-scale prospective studies.
    Liu B; Young H; Crowe FL; Benson VS; Spencer EA; Key TJ; Appleby PN; Beral V
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Nov; 14(11):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 21729481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement Errors in Dietary Assessment Using Self-Reported 24-Hour Recalls in Low-Income Countries and Strategies for Their Prevention.
    Gibson RS; Charrondiere UR; Bell W
    Adv Nutr; 2017 Nov; 8(6):980-991. PubMed ID: 29141979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Accuracy of Portion Size Reporting on Self-Administered Online 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Among Women With Low Incomes.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Guenther PM; Durward C; Douglass D; Zimmerman TP; Kahle LL; Atoloye AT; Marcinow ML; Savoie-Roskos MR; Herrick KA; Dodd KW
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2022 Dec; 122(12):2243-2256. PubMed ID: 35390532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.