These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30404466)

  • 1. Localization of broadband sounds carrying interaural time differences: Effects of frequency, reference location, and interaural coherence.
    Buchholz JM; Le Goff N; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Oct; 144(4):2225. PubMed ID: 30404466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual sensitivity to high-frequency interaural time differences created by rustling sounds.
    Ewert SD; Kaiser K; Kernschmidt L; Wiegrebe L
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 13(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 22124890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuronal sensitivity to interaural time differences in the sound envelope in the auditory cortex of the pallid bat.
    Lohuis TD; Fuzessery ZM
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):43-57. PubMed ID: 10771183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences.
    Joris PX; Yin TC
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Mar; 73(3):1043-62. PubMed ID: 7608754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of interaural time delays of noise stimuli on low-frequency cells in the cat's inferior colliculus. III. Evidence for cross-correlation.
    Yin TC; Chan JC; Carney LH
    J Neurophysiol; 1987 Sep; 58(3):562-83. PubMed ID: 3655883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of interaural time delays of noise stimuli on low-frequency cells in the cat's inferior colliculus. II. Responses to band-pass filtered noises.
    Chan JC; Yin TC; Musicant AD
    J Neurophysiol; 1987 Sep; 58(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 3655882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A physiologically based model of interaural time difference discrimination.
    Hancock KE; Delgutte B
    J Neurosci; 2004 Aug; 24(32):7110-7. PubMed ID: 15306644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaural time differences: implications regarding the neurophysiology of sound localization.
    Roth GL; Kochhar RK; Hind JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1643-51. PubMed ID: 7462463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Slow Temporal Integration Enables Robust Neural Coding and Perception of a Cue to Sound Source Location.
    Brown AD; Tollin DJ
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9908-21. PubMed ID: 27656028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences in the rabbit.
    Ebert CS; Blanks DA; Patel MR; Coffey CS; Marshall AF; Fitzpatrick DC
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):134-42. PubMed ID: 18093767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Localization of sound in rooms. V. Binaural coherence and human sensitivity to interaural time differences in noise.
    Rakerd B; Hartmann WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3052-63. PubMed ID: 21110600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling of human low frequency sound localization acuity demonstrates dominance of spatial variation of interaural time difference and suggests uniform just-noticeable differences in interaural time difference.
    Smith RC; Price SR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89033. PubMed ID: 24558468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combination of Interaural Level and Time Difference in Azimuthal Sound Localization in Owls.
    Kettler L; Griebel H; Ferger R; Wagner H
    eNeuro; 2017; 4(6):. PubMed ID: 29379866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural Maps of Interaural Time Difference in the American Alligator: A Stable Feature in Modern Archosaurs.
    Kettler L; Carr CE
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(20):3882-3896. PubMed ID: 30886018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. Characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive.
    Joris PX
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Oct; 76(4):2137-56. PubMed ID: 8899590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural responses to simple simulated echoes in the auditory brain stem of the unanesthetized rabbit.
    Fitzpatrick DC; Kuwada S; Batra R; Trahiotis C
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Dec; 74(6):2469-86. PubMed ID: 8747207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Envelope contributions to the representation of interaural time difference in the forebrain of barn owls.
    Tellers P; Lehmann J; Führ H; Wagner H
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Sep; 118(3):1871-1887. PubMed ID: 28679844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex?
    Altmann CF; Terada S; Kashino M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Furukawa S
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():121-7. PubMed ID: 24709274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptation in sound localization processing induced by interaural time difference in amplitude envelope at high frequencies.
    Kawashima T; Sato T
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41328. PubMed ID: 22848464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.