These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30404574)

  • 1. Expectations for tonal cadences: Sensory and cognitive priming effects.
    Sears DR; Pearce MT; Spitzer J; Caplin WE; McAdams S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1422-1438. PubMed ID: 30404574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A combined model of sensory and cognitive representations underlying tonal expectations in music: from audio signals to behavior.
    Collins T; Tillmann B; Barrett FS; Delbé C; Janata P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jan; 121(1):33-65. PubMed ID: 24490788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Harmonic and rhythmic influences on musical expectancy.
    Schmuckler MA; Boltz MG
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Sep; 56(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 7971131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priming in melody perception: tracking down the strength of cognitive expectations.
    Marmel F; Tillmann B; Delbé C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Aug; 36(4):1016-28. PubMed ID: 20695715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The tonal function of a task-irrelevant chord modulates speed of visual processing.
    Escoffier N; Tillmann B
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):1070-83. PubMed ID: 18076873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissonant endings of chord progressions elicit a larger ERAN than ambiguous endings in musicians.
    Pagès-Portabella C; Toro JM
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Feb; 57(2):e13476. PubMed ID: 31512751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Studying Musical and Linguistic Prediction in Comparable Ways: The Melodic Cloze Probability Method.
    Fogel AR; Rosenberg JC; Lehman FM; Kuperberg GR; Patel AD
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1718. PubMed ID: 26617548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction under uncertainty: Dissociating sensory from cognitive expectations in highly uncertain musical contexts.
    Mencke I; Quiroga-Martinez DR; Omigie D; Michalareas G; Schwarzacher F; Haumann NT; Vuust P; Brattico E
    Brain Res; 2021 Dec; 1773():147664. PubMed ID: 34560052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive and sensory expectations independently shape musical expectancy and pleasure.
    Cheung VKM; Harrison PMC; Koelsch S; Pearce MT; Friederici AD; Meyer L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 379(1895):20220420. PubMed ID: 38104601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tonal expectations influence early pitch processing.
    Marmel F; Perrin F; Tillmann B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):3095-104. PubMed ID: 21265601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical learning and Gestalt-like principles predict melodic expectations.
    Morgan E; Fogel A; Nair A; Patel AD
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():23-34. PubMed ID: 30913527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tonal centers and expectancy: facilitation or inhibition of chords at the top of the harmonic hierarchy?
    Tillmann B; Janata P; Birk J; Bharucha JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1031-43. PubMed ID: 18665743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tonal expectations influence pitch perception.
    Marmel F; Tillmann B; Dowling WJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Jul; 70(5):841-52. PubMed ID: 18613632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familiar Tonal Context Improves Accuracy of Pitch Interval Perception.
    Graves JE; Oxenham AJ
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1753. PubMed ID: 29062295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-cultural music cognition: cognitive methodology applied to North Sami yoiks.
    Krumhansl CL; Toivanen P; Eerola T; Toiviainen P; Järvinen T; Louhivuori J
    Cognition; 2000 Jul; 76(1):13-58. PubMed ID: 10822042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The costs and benefits of tonal centers for chord processing.
    Tillmann B; Janata P; Birk J; Bharucha JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):470-82. PubMed ID: 12760629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing tonal modulations: an ERP study.
    Koelsch S; Gunter T; Schröger E; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1149-59. PubMed ID: 14709233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational-Model-Based Analysis of Context Effects on Harmonic Expectancy.
    Morimoto S; Remijn GB; Nakajima Y
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151374. PubMed ID: 27003807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expectation adaptation for rare cadences in music: Item order matters in repetition priming.
    Chander A; Aslin RN
    Cognition; 2023 Nov; 240():105601. PubMed ID: 37604028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Musical Expectations Enhance Auditory Cortical Processing in Musicians: A Magnetoencephalography Study.
    Park JM; Chung CK; Kim JS; Lee KM; Seol J; Yi SW
    Neuroscience; 2018 Jan; 369():325-335. PubMed ID: 29183828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.