These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30404624)

  • 21. Analysis of testing with multiple choice versus open-ended questions: Outcome-based observations in an anatomy course.
    Melovitz Vasan CA; DeFouw DO; Holland BK; Vasan NS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 28941215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of changing multiple choice questions from "all of the above" to "select all that apply".
    Dell KA; DeVries DM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2024 Mar; 16(3):174-177. PubMed ID: 38218657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three- and four-option multiple-choice questions in nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2010 Aug; 30(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 20053488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are faculty predictions or item taxonomies useful for estimating the outcome of multiple-choice examinations?
    Kibble JD; Johnson T
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Dec; 35(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 22139777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rarely selected distractors in high stakes medical multiple-choice examinations and their recognition by item authors: a simulation and survey.
    Rogausch A; Hofer R; Krebs R
    BMC Med Educ; 2010 Nov; 10():85. PubMed ID: 21106066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper.
    Sim SM; Rasiah RI
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Feb; 35(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 16565756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Benefit of a Switch: Answer-Changing on Multiple-Choice Exams by First-Year Dental Students.
    Pagni SE; Bak AG; Eisen SE; Murphy JL; Finkelman MD; Kugel G
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Jan; 81(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 28049684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Construction of Multiple Choice Questions Before and After An Educational Intervention.
    Tenzin K; Dorji T; Tenzin T
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2017; 56(205):112-116. PubMed ID: 28598446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does Educator Training or Experience Affect the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions?
    Webb EM; Phuong JS; Naeger DM
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):1317-22. PubMed ID: 26277486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. High time for a change: psychometric analysis of multiple-choice questions in nursing.
    Redmond SP; Hartigan-Rogers JA; Cobbett S
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2012 Nov; 9():. PubMed ID: 23192053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?
    Hift RJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():249. PubMed ID: 25431359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and validation of immediate self-feedback very short answer questions for medical students: practical implementation of generalizability theory to estimate reliability in formative examination designs.
    Lertsakulbunlue S; Kantiwong A
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):572. PubMed ID: 38789958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peer review improves psychometric characteristics of multiple choice questions.
    Abozaid H; Park YS; Tekian A
    Med Teach; 2017 Apr; 39(sup1):S50-S54. PubMed ID: 28103718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.
    Zaidi NB; Hwang C; Scott S; Stallard S; Purkiss J; Hortsch M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 28231408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patients don't come with multiple choice options: essay-based assessment in UME.
    Bird JB; Olvet DM; Willey JM; Brenner J
    Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1649959. PubMed ID: 31438809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Impact of 3-Option Responses to Multiple-Choice Questions on Guessing Strategies and Cut Score Determinations.
    Royal KD; Stockdale MR
    J Adv Med Educ Prof; 2017 Apr; 5(2):84-89. PubMed ID: 28367465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.
    Vyas R; Supe A
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 19004145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.
    Notebaert AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison in the quality of distractors in three and four options type of multiple choice questions.
    Rahma NAA; Shamad MMA; Idris MEA; Elfaki OA; Elfakey WEM; Salih KMA
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2017; 8():287-291. PubMed ID: 28442942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.