These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30405194)

  • 1. Rapid adaptation in phoretic mite development time.
    Schedwill P; Geiler AM; Nehring V
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16460. PubMed ID: 30405194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competition among host-specific lineages of
    Sun SJ; Kilner RM
    Ecol Evol; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e10837. PubMed ID: 38192905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phoretic Poecilochirus mites specialize on their burying beetle hosts.
    Nehring V; Müller JK; Steinmetz N
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Dec; 7(24):10743-10751. PubMed ID: 29299254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interspecific interactions explain variation in the duration of paternal care in the burying beetle.
    De Gasperin O; Duarte A; Kilner RM
    Anim Behav; 2015 Nov; 109():199-207. PubMed ID: 26778845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dispersal behaviour of the phoretic mite Poecilochirus carabi (Mesostigmata, Parasitidae): adaptation to the breeding biology of its carrier Necrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera, Silphidae).
    Schwarz HH; Müller JK
    Oecologia; 1992 Apr; 89(4):487-493. PubMed ID: 28311878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From the host's point of view: Effects of variation in burying beetle brood care and brood size on the interaction with parasitic mites.
    Schedwill P; Paschkewitz S; Teubner H; Steinmetz N; Nehring V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0228047. PubMed ID: 31961905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cryptic diversity within the Poecilochirus carabi mite species complex phoretic on Nicrophorus burying beetles: Phylogeny, biogeography, and host specificity.
    Canitz J; Sikes DS; Knee W; Baumann J; Haftaro P; Steinmetz N; Nave M; Eggert AK; Hwang W; Nehring V
    Mol Ecol; 2022 Jan; 31(2):658-674. PubMed ID: 34704311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No evidence of a cleaning mutualism between burying beetles and their phoretic mites.
    Duarte A; Cotter SC; De Gasperin O; Houslay TM; Boncoraglio G; Welch M; Kilner RM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13838. PubMed ID: 29062089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical adaptations enable phoretic mite species to occupy distinct spatial niches on host burying beetles.
    Sun SJ; Chen S; Federle W; Kilner RM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Mar; 291(2019):20240230. PubMed ID: 38503335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose-independent virulence in phoretic mites that parasitize burying beetles.
    Nehring V; Teubner H; König S
    Int J Parasitol; 2019 Sep; 49(10):759-767. PubMed ID: 31401062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interspecific Interactions and the Scope for Parent-Offspring Conflict: High Mite Density Temporarily Changes the Trade-Off between Offspring Size and Number in the Burying Beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.
    De Gasperin O; Kilner RM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150969. PubMed ID: 26985819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temperature stress induces mites to help their carrion beetle hosts by eliminating rival blowflies.
    Sun SJ; Kilner RM
    Elife; 2020 Aug; 9():. PubMed ID: 32755542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structure of Phoretic Mite Assemblages Across Subcortical Beetle Species at a Regional Scale.
    Pfammatter JA; Coyle DR; Gandhi KJ; Hernandez N; Hofstetter RW; Moser JC; Raffa KF
    Environ Entomol; 2016 Feb; 45(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 26496952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Friend or foe: inter-specific interactions and conflicts of interest within the family.
    De Gasperin O; Kilner RM
    Ecol Entomol; 2015 Dec; 40(6):787-795. PubMed ID: 26681822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do Phoretic Mites Influence the Reproductive Success of Ips grandicollis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)?
    Pfammatter JA; Raffa KF
    Environ Entomol; 2015 Dec; 44(6):1498-511. PubMed ID: 26314027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fitness costs of phoretic nematodes in the burying beetle,
    Wang Y; Rozen DE
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 30680093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social environment affects the life history tactic of a phoretic mite.
    Nehring V; Müller JK
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Aug; 22(8):1616-23. PubMed ID: 19538345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phoretic mite communities associated with bark beetles in the maritime and stone pine forests of Setúbal, Portugal.
    Vissa S; Hofstetter RW; Bonifácio L; Khaustov A; Knee W; Uhey DA
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2019 Feb; 77(2):117-131. PubMed ID: 30810852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Dynamics of infection of Fringilla coelebs chaffinch nestlings with feather mites (Acari: Analgoidea)].
    Mironov SV; Malyshev LL
    Parazitologiia; 2002; 36(5):356-74. PubMed ID: 12481604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conflict within species determines the value of a mutualism between species.
    Sun SJ; Horrocks NPC; Kilner RM
    Evol Lett; 2019 Apr; 3(2):185-197. PubMed ID: 31007944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.