BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30406091)

  • 1. Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers.
    Castro APG; Yao J; Battisti T; Lacroix D
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2018; 6():142. PubMed ID: 30406091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical implementation of an osmo-poro-visco-hyperelastic finite element solver: application to the intervertebral disc.
    Castro APG; Alves JL
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Apr; 24(5):538-550. PubMed ID: 33111576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined numerical and experimental biomechanical characterization of soft collagen hydrogel substrate.
    Castro AP; Laity P; Shariatzadeh M; Wittkowske C; Holland C; Lacroix D
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2016 Apr; 27(4):79. PubMed ID: 26914710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element implementation of a generalized Fung-elastic constitutive model for planar soft tissues.
    Sun W; Sacks MS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2005 Nov; 4(2-3):190-9. PubMed ID: 16075264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intervertebral disc creep behavior assessment through an open source finite element solver.
    Castro AP; Wilson W; Huyghe JM; Ito K; Alves JL
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):297-301. PubMed ID: 24210477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Graphene oxide/poly(acrylic acid)/gelatin nanocomposite hydrogel: experimental and numerical validation of hyperelastic model.
    Faghihi S; Karimi A; Jamadi M; Imani R; Salarian R
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 May; 38():299-305. PubMed ID: 24656382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic comparison between FEBio and PolyFEM for biomechanical systems.
    Martin L; Jain P; Ferguson Z; Gholamalizadeh T; Moshfeghifar F; Erleben K; Panozzo D; Abramowitch S; Schneider T
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Feb; 244():107938. PubMed ID: 38056313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Validated Open-Source Multisolver Fourth-Generation Composite Femur Model.
    MacLeod AR; Rose H; Gill HS
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27618586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Source codes and simulation data for the finite element implementation of the conventional and localizing gradient damage methods in ABAQUS.
    Sarkar S; Singh IV; Mishra BK; Shedbale AS; Poh LH
    Data Brief; 2019 Oct; 26():104533. PubMed ID: 31667295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital image correlation and finite element modelling as a method to determine mechanical properties of human soft tissue in vivo.
    Moerman KM; Holt CA; Evans SL; Simms CK
    J Biomech; 2009 May; 42(8):1150-3. PubMed ID: 19362312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A visco-hyperelastic constitutive approach for modeling polyvinyl alcohol sponge.
    Karimi A; Navidbakhsh M; Beigzadeh B
    Tissue Cell; 2014 Feb; 46(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 24405852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-fidelity surrogate modeling through hybrid machine learning for biomechanical and finite element analysis of soft tissues.
    Sajjadinia SS; Carpentieri B; Shriram D; Holzapfel GA
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Sep; 148():105699. PubMed ID: 35715259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms: Comparing accuracy of CFD solvers based on finite element and finite volume schemes.
    Botti L; Paliwal N; Conti P; Antiga L; Meng H
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 34(9):e3111. PubMed ID: 29858530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection and modelling of contacts in explicit finite-element simulation of soft tissue biomechanics.
    Johnsen SF; Taylor ZA; Han L; Hu Y; Clarkson MJ; Hawkes DJ; Ourselin S
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1873-91. PubMed ID: 25559760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element methods for the biomechanics of soft hydrated tissues: nonlinear analysis and adaptive control of meshes.
    Spilker RL; de Almeida ES; Donzelli PS
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(3-4):279-313. PubMed ID: 1478094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intact vitreous humor as a potential extracellular matrix hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering applications.
    Lindberg GCJ; Longoni A; Lim KS; Rosenberg AJ; Hooper GJ; Gawlitta D; Woodfield TBF
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Feb; 85():117-130. PubMed ID: 30572166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Material properties in unconfined compression of gelatin hydrogel for skin tissue engineering applications.
    Karimi A; Navidbakhsh M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Dec; 59(6):479-86. PubMed ID: 24988278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Micromechanics and constitutive modeling of connective soft tissues.
    Fallah A; Ahmadian MT; Firozbakhsh K; Aghdam MM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jul; 60():157-176. PubMed ID: 26807767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On implementation of fibrous connective tissues' damage in Abaqus software.
    Sabik A; Witkowski W
    J Biomech; 2023 Aug; 157():111736. PubMed ID: 37517283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coupled porohyperelastic mass transport (PHEXPT) finite element models for soft tissues using ABAQUS.
    Vande Geest JP; Simon BR; Rigby PH; Newberg TP
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Apr; 133(4):044502. PubMed ID: 21428686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.