These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30406096)

  • 1. Readiness for Environmental Release of Genetically Engineered (GE) Plants in Uganda.
    Zawedde BM; Kwehangana M; Oloka HK
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2018; 6():152. PubMed ID: 30406096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lessons learned from the introduction of genetically engineered crops: relevance to gene drive deployment in Africa.
    Quemada H
    Transgenic Res; 2022 Jun; 31(3):285-311. PubMed ID: 35545692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commercial Release of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: Interface Between Biosafety Regulatory Systems and Varietal Release Systems.
    Akinbo O; Obukosia S; Ouedraogo J; Sinebo W; Savadogo M; Timpo S; Mbabazi R; Maredia K; Makinde D; Ambali A
    Front Plant Sci; 2021; 12():605937. PubMed ID: 33828569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Innovative farmers and regulatory gatekeepers: Genetically modified crops regulation and adoption in developing countries.
    Sinebo W; Maredia K
    GM Crops Food; 2016 Jan; 7(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26954893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of agricultural biotechnology and biosafety regulations used to assess the safety of genetically modified crops in Iran.
    Mousavi A; Malboobi MA; Esmailzadeh NS
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(5):1513-6. PubMed ID: 17956001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paraguay's Path Toward the Simplification of Procedures in the Approval of GE Crops.
    Benítez Candia N; Fernández Ríos D; Vicién C
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2020; 8():1023. PubMed ID: 32974329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetically engineered plants in the product development pipeline in India.
    Warrier R; Pande H
    GM Crops Food; 2016 Jan; 7(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 26954729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strengthening regulatory capacity for gene drives in Africa: leveraging NEPAD's experience in establishing regulatory systems for medicines and GM crops in Africa.
    Glover B; Akinbo O; Savadogo M; Timpo S; Lemgo G; Sinebo W; Akile S; Obukosia S; Ouedraogo J; Ndomondo-Sigonda M; Koch M; Makinde D; Ambali A
    BMC Proc; 2018; 12(Suppl 8):11. PubMed ID: 30079102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa.
    Komen J; Tripathi L; Mkoko B; Ofosu DO; Oloka H; Wangari D
    Front Plant Sci; 2020; 11():130. PubMed ID: 32210981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nematode 18S rRNA gene is a reliable tool for environmental biosafety assessment of transgenic banana in confined field trials.
    Nakacwa R; Kiggundu A; Talwana H; Namaganda J; Lilley C; Tushemereirwe W; Atkinson H
    Transgenic Res; 2013 Oct; 22(5):1003-10. PubMed ID: 23661261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Progress and Challenges for Implementation of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa Policy on Biotechnology and Biosafety.
    Waithaka M; Belay G; Kyotalimye M; Karembu M
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():109. PubMed ID: 26284243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Case studies on the use of biotechnologies and on biosafety provisions in four African countries.
    Black R; Fava F; Mattei N; Robert V; Seal S; Verdier V
    J Biotechnol; 2011 Dec; 156(4):370-81. PubMed ID: 21763362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public Submissions on the Uganda National Biotechnology and Biosafety Bill, 2012 Reveal Potential Way Forward for Uganda Legislators to Pass the Bill.
    Masiga CW
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():152. PubMed ID: 26501057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research.
    Nicolia A; Manzo A; Veronesi F; Rosellini D
    Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2014 Mar; 34(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 24041244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information tools for environmental risk assessment of low level presence - an introduction to the reviews of the environmental safety of proteins used in genetically engineered plants.
    Roberts A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2011; 10(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 22541882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of agribiotechnology and biosafety regulations used to assess safety of genetically modified crops in Bangladesh.
    Nasiruddin KM; Nasim A
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(5):1508-12. PubMed ID: 17956000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancements Needed in GE Crop and Food Regulation in the U.S.
    Benbrook C
    Front Public Health; 2016; 4():59. PubMed ID: 27066473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetically engineered plants and foods: a scientist's analysis of the issues (part II).
    Lemaux PG
    Annu Rev Plant Biol; 2009; 60():511-59. PubMed ID: 19400729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transgenic plants and biosafety: science, misconceptions and public perceptions.
    Stewart CN; Richards HA; Halfhill MD
    Biotechniques; 2000 Oct; 29(4):832-6, 838-43. PubMed ID: 11056815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proposed criteria for identifying GE crop plants that pose a low or negligible risk to the environment under conditions of low-level presence in seed.
    Roberts A; Finardi-Filho F; Hegde S; Kiekebusch J; Klimpel G; Krieger M; Lema MA; Macdonald P; Nari C; Rubinstein C; Slutsky B; Vicien C
    Transgenic Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):783-90. PubMed ID: 26264890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.