These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30406372)

  • 1. pK
    Işık M; Levorse D; Rustenburg AS; Ndukwe IE; Wang H; Wang X; Reibarkh M; Martin GE; Makarov AA; Mobley DL; Rhodes T; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1117-1138. PubMed ID: 30406372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overview of the SAMPL6 pK
    Işık M; Rustenburg AS; Rizzi A; Gunner MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Feb; 35(2):131-166. PubMed ID: 33394238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SAMPL6: calculation of macroscopic pK
    Selwa E; Kenney IM; Beckstein O; Iorga BI
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1203-1216. PubMed ID: 30084080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High accuracy quantum-chemistry-based calculation and blind prediction of macroscopic pKa values in the context of the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Pracht P; Wilcken R; Udvarhelyi A; Rodde S; Grimme S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1139-1149. PubMed ID: 30141103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standard state free energies, not pK
    Gunner MR; Murakami T; Rustenburg AS; Işık M; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):561-573. PubMed ID: 32052350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.
    Işık M; Bergazin TD; Fox T; Rizzi A; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):335-370. PubMed ID: 32107702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting aqueous pK
    Tielker N; Eberlein L; Güssregen S; Kast SM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 30073500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Octanol-water partition coefficient measurements for the SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge.
    Işık M; Levorse D; Mobley DL; Rhodes T; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):405-420. PubMed ID: 31858363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absolute and relative pK
    Zeng Q; Jones MR; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 30128926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An explicit-solvent hybrid QM and MM approach for predicting pKa of small molecules in SAMPL6 challenge.
    Prasad S; Huang J; Zeng Q; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1191-1201. PubMed ID: 30276503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. LogP prediction performance with the SMD solvation model and the M06 density functional family for SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge molecules.
    Guan D; Lui R; Matthews S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):511-522. PubMed ID: 31939103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantum-mechanical property prediction of solvated drug molecules: what have we learned from a decade of SAMPL blind prediction challenges?
    Tielker N; Eberlein L; Hessler G; Schmidt KF; Güssregen S; Kast SM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Apr; 35(4):453-472. PubMed ID: 33079358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of log P, pK
    Bergazin TD; Tielker N; Zhang Y; Mao J; Gunner MR; Francisco K; Ballatore C; Kast SM; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):771-802. PubMed ID: 34169394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.
    Rizzi A; Murkli S; McNeill JN; Yao W; Sullivan M; Gilson MK; Chiu MW; Isaacs L; Gibb BC; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):937-963. PubMed ID: 30415285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stacking Gaussian processes to improve [Formula: see text] predictions in the SAMPL7 challenge.
    Raddi RM; Voelz VA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Sep; 35(9):953-961. PubMed ID: 34363562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring experimental cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge.
    Rustenburg AS; Dancer J; Lin B; Feng JA; Ortwine DF; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):945-958. PubMed ID: 27718028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated high throughput pK
    Bahr MN; Nandkeolyar A; Kenna JK; Nevins N; Da Vià L; Işık M; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Nov; 35(11):1141-1155. PubMed ID: 34714468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linkage between proton binding and folding in RNA: a thermodynamic framework and its experimental application for investigating pKa shifting.
    Moody EM; Lecomte JT; Bevilacqua PC
    RNA; 2005 Feb; 11(2):157-72. PubMed ID: 15659356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acidity constants and protonation sites of cyclic dinucleotides determined by capillary electrophoresis, quantum chemical calculations, and NMR spectroscopy.
    Štěpánová S; Andris E; Gutten O; Buděšínský M; Dejmek M; Břehová P; Rulíšek L; Kašička V
    Electrophoresis; 2024 Apr; 45(7-8):687-705. PubMed ID: 38059733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Virtual Mixture Approach to the Study of Multistate Equilibrium: Application to Constant pH Simulation in Explicit Water.
    Wu X; Brooks BR
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Oct; 11(10):e1004480. PubMed ID: 26506245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.