These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

605 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30407144)

  • 1. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A; Bartholomew K; Aagaard N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0235618. PubMed ID: 32756563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent.
    Nakkash R; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Wright K; El-Alti L; Makhoul J; Al-Ali K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
    Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
    Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are Research Ethics Committees Prepared for Community-Based Participatory Research?
    Tamariz L; Medina H; Taylor J; Carrasquillo O; Kobetz E; Palacio A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 26527370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surveying the Indian research ethics committee response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Shetty YC; Ramalingam S; Koli P; Shanmugam K; Seetharaman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2024 Sep; 24(3):243-253. PubMed ID: 37540074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How US institutional review boards decide when researchers need to translate studies.
    Klitzman R
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 40(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 23475805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries.
    Silverman H; Sleem H; Moodley K; Kumar N; Naidoo S; Subramanian T; Jaafar R; Moni M
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 41(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 24748650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence of IRB/REC Members in Their Assessments of Human Research Risk: A Study of IRB/REC Decision Making in Action.
    Grinnell F; Sadler JZ; McNamara V; Senetar K; Reisch J
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Jul; 12(3):140-149. PubMed ID: 28558484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing.
    Tod AM; Nicolson P; Allmark P
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Nov; 40(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 12421396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?
    Angell E; Tarrant C; Dixon-Woods M
    J Clin Pathol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):825-9. PubMed ID: 19734481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research ethics committees in a tight spot: Approving consent strategies for child research that are prima facie illegal but are ethical in terms of national guidelines.
    Strode AE; Singh PP; Slack CM; Wassenaar DR
    S Afr Med J; 2018 Oct; 108(10):828-832. PubMed ID: 30421709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognizing Risk and Vulnerability in Research Ethics: Imagining the "What Ifs?".
    Peter E; Friedland J
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Apr; 12(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 28421885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees.
    Burgess T; Rennie S; Moodley K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Feb; 24(1):11. PubMed ID: 36793067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research.
    Sewankambo NK; Kutyabami P
    Infect Dis Poverty; 2022 Sep; 11(1):103. PubMed ID: 36171611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What Can IRBs Learn From CABs? A Qualitative Analysis of the Experiences of Recruitment and Training of Nonscientist Members on Research Review Boards.
    Solomon Cargill S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 29226746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.