BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30407263)

  • 1. Does Gender Influence Postoperative Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Patel DV; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Mar; 32(2):E107-E111. PubMed ID: 30407263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of local steroid application in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Patel DV; Bawa MS; Ahn J; Bohl DD; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):222-227. PubMed ID: 30497132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PHQ-9 Score Predicts Postoperative Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Patel DV; Yoo JS; Khechen B; Haws BE; Block AM; Lamoutte EH; Karmarkar SS; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Dec; 32(10):444-448. PubMed ID: 30932934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Postoperative Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Yoo JS; Patel DS; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Mogilevsky FA; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jul; 33(6):E263-E268. PubMed ID: 31503049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis.
    Hijji FY; Narain AS; Bohl DD; Yom KH; Kudaravalli KT; Lopez GD; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):E92-E97. PubMed ID: 28538082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Leg Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement, and Patient Satisfaction After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Parsons AW; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1196-e1207. PubMed ID: 36075356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex Differences on Postoperative Pain and Disability Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy.
    Patel DV; Yoo JS; Karmarkar SS; Lamoutte EH; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Dec; 32(10):E444-E448. PubMed ID: 31162188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of PROMIS in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary evaluation.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Bohl DD; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jul; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 29652236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Back Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Recovery Ratios, and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF).
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e254-e265. PubMed ID: 34583000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Ribot MA; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e334-e346. PubMed ID: 34942388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PROMIS Physical Function for prediction of postoperative pain, narcotics consumption, and patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Patel DV; Bawa MS; Haws BE; Khechen B; Block AM; Karmarkar SS; Lamoutte EH; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Feb; 30(4):476-482. PubMed ID: 30717042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postoperative Outcomes Based on American Society of Anesthesiologists Score After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Yoo JS; Parrish JM; Jenkins NW; Khechen B; Haws BE; Narain AS; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Feb; 33(1):E40-E42. PubMed ID: 31913170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?
    Morse KW; Alluri RK; Vaishnav AS; Urakawa H; Mok JK; Virk SS; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):570-577. PubMed ID: 34699995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recovery ratios and minimum clinically important difference for clinical outcomes in workers' compensation recipients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus ALIF.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Zheng E; Massel DH; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Feb; 165(2):315-323. PubMed ID: 36637505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does Preoperative Back Pain Impact Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis?
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Zheng E; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Federico VP; Massel DH; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Jun; 37(5):E179-E184. PubMed ID: 38178316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Obesity Severity on Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Mohan S; Geoghegan CE; Jadczak CN; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Feb; 35(1):E267-E273. PubMed ID: 34050042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.