208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30408106)
1. Regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib-A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Shlomai A; Leshno M; Goldstein DA
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207132. PubMed ID: 30408106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost effectiveness of regorafenib as second-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Parikh ND; Singal AG; Hutton DW
Cancer; 2017 Oct; 123(19):3725-3731. PubMed ID: 28662266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiviral therapy in patients with advanced hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.
Zhang P; Yang Y; Wen F; Wheeler J; Fu P; Li Q
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Dec; 31(12):1978-1985. PubMed ID: 27118432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative cost-effectiveness of cabozantinib as second-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Germany and the United States.
Sieg M; Hartmann M; Settmacher U; Arefian H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):120. PubMed ID: 32316925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cai H; Zhang L; Li N; Zheng B; Liu M
J Comp Eff Res; 2020 Jun; 9(8):553-562. PubMed ID: 32419473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic evaluation of sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Carr BI; Carroll S; Muszbek N; Gondek K
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Nov; 25(11):1739-46. PubMed ID: 21039835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib as a first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Zhang P; Yang Y; Wen F; He X; Tang R; Du Z; Zhou J; Zhang J; Li Q
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Jul; 27(7):853-9. PubMed ID: 25919775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib treatment in field practice for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Cammà C; Cabibbo G; Petta S; Enea M; Iavarone M; Grieco A; Gasbarrini A; Villa E; Zavaglia C; Bruno R; Colombo M; Craxì A; ;
Hepatology; 2013 Mar; 57(3):1046-54. PubMed ID: 23299720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-Effectiveness of Cabozantinib in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Soto-Perez-de-Celis E; Aguiar PN; Cordón ML; Chavarri-Guerra Y; Lopes GL
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2019 Jun; 17(6):669-675. PubMed ID: 31200357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Goldstein DA; Ahmad BB; Chen Q; Ayer T; Howard DH; Lipscomb J; El-Rayes BF; Flowers CR
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(32):3727-32. PubMed ID: 26304904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness of Lenvatinib Compared with Sorafenib for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Australia.
Saiyed M; Byrnes J; Srivastava T; Scuffham P; Downes M
Clin Drug Investig; 2020 Dec; 40(12):1167-1176. PubMed ID: 33140194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Su D; Wu B; Shi L
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Connock M; Round J; Bayliss S; Tubeuf S; Greenheld W; Moore D
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14 Suppl 1():17-21. PubMed ID: 20507799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus best supportive care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Egypt.
Hamdy Elsisi G; Nada Y; Rashad N; Carapinha J
J Med Econ; 2019 Feb; 22(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 30479174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus SBRT for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Leung HW; Liu CF; Chan AL
Radiat Oncol; 2016 May; 11():69. PubMed ID: 27193904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of lenvatinib treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) compared with sorafenib in Japan.
Kobayashi M; Kudo M; Izumi N; Kaneko S; Azuma M; Copher R; Meier G; Pan J; Ishii M; Ikeda S
J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 54(6):558-570. PubMed ID: 30788569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib versus regorafenib as the third-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in China.
Guan X; Li H; Xiong X; Peng C; Wang N; Ma X; Ma A
J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):339-344. PubMed ID: 33571036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Bruix J; Qin S; Merle P; Granito A; Huang YH; Bodoky G; Pracht M; Yokosuka O; Rosmorduc O; Breder V; Gerolami R; Masi G; Ross PJ; Song T; Bronowicki JP; Ollivier-Hourmand I; Kudo M; Cheng AL; Llovet JM; Finn RS; LeBerre MA; Baumhauer A; Meinhardt G; Han G;
Lancet; 2017 Jan; 389(10064):56-66. PubMed ID: 27932229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FOLFOX4 or sorafenib as the first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Zhang P; Wen F; Li Q
Dig Liver Dis; 2016 Dec; 48(12):1492-1497. PubMed ID: 27486048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.
Cho SK; Hay JW; Barzi A
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2018 Dec; 17(4):e751-e761. PubMed ID: 30228027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
