222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30409729)
1. Dose-guided patient positioning in proton radiotherapy using multicriteria-optimization.
Kurz C; Süss P; Arnsmeyer C; Haehnle J; Teichert K; Landry G; Hofmaier J; Exner F; Hille L; Kamp F; Thieke C; Ganswindt U; Valentini C; Hölscher T; Troost E; Krause M; Belka C; Küfer KH; Parodi K; Richter C
Z Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 29(3):216-228. PubMed ID: 30409729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel method for interactive multi-objective dose-guided patient positioning.
Haehnle J; Süss P; Landry G; Teichert K; Hille L; Hofmaier J; Nowak D; Kamp F; Reiner M; Thieke C; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Parodi K; Küfer KH; Kurz C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(1):165-185. PubMed ID: 27991454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positioning accuracy and daily dose assessment for prostate cancer treatment using in-room CT image guidance at a proton therapy facility.
Maeda Y; Sato Y; Minami H; Yasukawa Y; Yamamoto K; Tamamura H; Shibata S; Bou S; Sasaki M; Tameshige Y; Kume K; Ooto H; Kasahara S; Shimizu Y; Saga Y; Omoya A; Saitou M
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1832-1843. PubMed ID: 29532489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating deformable image registration and scatter correction for CBCT-based dose calculation in adaptive IMPT.
Kurz C; Kamp F; Park YK; Zöllner C; Rit S; Hansen D; Podesta M; Sharp GC; Li M; Reiner M; Hofmaier J; Neppl S; Thieke C; Nijhuis R; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Winey BA; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5635. PubMed ID: 27782706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating CT to CBCT image registration for head and neck proton therapy as a tool for daily dose recalculation.
Landry G; Nijhuis R; Dedes G; Handrack J; Thieke C; Janssens G; Orban de Xivry J; Reiner M; Kamp F; Wilkens JJ; Paganelli C; Riboldi M; Baroni G; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Parodi K
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1354-66. PubMed ID: 25735290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images.
Koivula L; Wee L; Korhonen J
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4634. PubMed ID: 27487880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential proton and photon dose degradation in advanced head and neck cancer patients by intratherapy changes.
Stützer K; Jakobi A; Bandurska-Luque A; Barczyk S; Arnsmeyer C; Löck S; Richter C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):104-113. PubMed ID: 28921843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptive method for multicriteria optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Kamal-Sayed H; Ma J; Tseung H; Abdel-Rehim A; Herman MG; Beltran CJ
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5643-5652. PubMed ID: 30332515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential.
Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Craft D; Niemierko A; Trofimov A; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 23790771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing cone-beam CT intensity correction methods for dose recalculation in adaptive intensity-modulated photon and proton therapy for head and neck cancer.
Kurz C; Dedes G; Resch A; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Nijhuis R; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1651-7. PubMed ID: 26198654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of Anatomical Position Errors on Dose Distribution in Head and Neck Radiotherapy and Robust Image Registration Against Anatomical Changes.
Hirotaki K; Tomizawa K; Moriya S; Ito M; Sakae T
Anticancer Res; 2023 Apr; 43(4):1827-1834. PubMed ID: 36974799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes.
Mohan R; Zhang X; Wang H; Kang Y; Wang X; Liu H; Ang KK; Kuban D; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1258-66. PubMed ID: 15752908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptive planning in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancers: single-institution experience and clinical implications.
Ahn PH; Chen CC; Ahn AI; Hong L; Scripes PG; Shen J; Lee CC; Miller E; Kalnicki S; Garg MK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Jul; 80(3):677-85. PubMed ID: 20619553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-criterial patient positioning based on dose recalculation on scatter-corrected CBCT images.
Hofmaier J; Haehnle J; Kurz C; Landry G; Maihoefer C; Schüttrumpf L; Süss P; Teichert K; Söhn M; Spahr N; Brachmann C; Weiler F; Thieke C; Küfer KH; Belka C; Parodi K; Kamp F
Radiother Oncol; 2017 Dec; 125(3):464-469. PubMed ID: 29033253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric effects of the prone and supine positions on image guided localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Liu B; Lerma FA; Patel S; Amin P; Feng Y; Yi BY; Yu C
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 18207595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The residual setup errors of different IGRT alignment procedures for head and neck IMRT and the resulting dosimetric impact.
Graff P; Kirby N; Weinberg V; Chen J; Yom SS; Lambert L; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 May; 86(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 23245281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing photon and proton-based hypofractioned SBRT for prostate cancer accounting for robustness and realistic treatment deliverability.
Goddard LC; Brodin NP; Bodner WR; Garg MK; Tomé WA
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20180010. PubMed ID: 29436852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
