431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30410142)
1. Surgical outcomes of decompressive laminectomy by transspinous approach for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ücer M; Aydin I; Tacyildiz AE; Dogan I; Emel E
J Pak Med Assoc; 2018 Nov; 68(11):1618-1624. PubMed ID: 30410142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of Spinous Process Splitting Decompression Compared with Conventional Laminectomy for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis.
Ovalioglu TC; Ozdemir Ovalioglu A; Canaz G; Gunes M; Babur M; Emel E
World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e1233-e1242. PubMed ID: 35691518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report.
Cho DY; Lin HL; Lee WY; Lee HC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Mar; 6(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 17355022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.
Pietrantonio A; Trungu S; Famà I; Forcato S; Miscusi M; Raco A
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E2. PubMed ID: 31042648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ
Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of multisegmental transforaminal enlarged decompression plus posterior pedicle screw fixation for multilevel lumbar spinal canal stenosis associated with lumbar instability.
Sun C; Tian WJ; Liu HX; Guan PG
Int J Surg; 2018 Feb; 50():72-78. PubMed ID: 29329787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach.
Papavero L; Thiel M; Fritzsche E; Kunze C; Westphal M; Kothe R
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):182-7; discussion187. PubMed ID: 19934993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.
Chang HS; Fujisawa N; Tsuchiya T; Oya S; Matsui T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 24365897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Iguchi T; Kurihara A; Nakayama J; Sato K; Kurosaka M; Yamasaki K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(14):1754-9. PubMed ID: 10888941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Short-term effectiveness of interlaminar lumbar instrumented fusion through a small incision for lumbar spinal stenosis].
Wang S; Chao J; Wei J; Diaz FG
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 26(6):703-7. PubMed ID: 22792768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Percutaneous Endoscopic Laminotomy with Flavectomy by Uniportal, Unilateral Approach for the Lumbar Canal or Lateral Recess Stenosis.
Lee CW; Yoon KJ; Jun JH
World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():e129-e137. PubMed ID: 29425979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Single-Level and Multilevel Decompressive Laminectomy for Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Adilay U; Guclu B
World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e235-e240. PubMed ID: 29258933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative outcome and radiographic comparisons between laminectomy and laminotomy in the treatment of acquired lumbar stenosis.
Thomas NW; Rea GL; Pikul BK; Mervis LJ; Irsik R; McGregor JM
Neurosurgery; 1997 Sep; 41(3):567-74; discussion 574-5. PubMed ID: 9310973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
