168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30410929)
1. Length Scale Matters: Real-Time Elastography versus Nanomechanical Profiling by Atomic Force Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions.
Zanetti-Dällenbach R; Plodinec M; Oertle P; Redling K; Obermann EC; Lim RYH; Schoenenberger CA
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():3840597. PubMed ID: 30410929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.
Kokubu Y; Yamada K; Tanabe M; Izumori A; Kato C; Horii R; Ohno S; Matsueda K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 33389371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions.
Adamietz BR; Meier-Meitinger M; Fasching P; Beckmann M; Hartmann A; Uder M; Häberle L; Schulz-Wendtland R; Schwab SA
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Feb; 32(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 21165816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience.
Raza S; Odulate A; Ong EM; Chikarmane S; Harston CW
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Apr; 29(4):551-63. PubMed ID: 20375374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nanomechanical properties of solid tumors as treatment monitoring biomarkers.
Stylianou A; Mpekris F; Voutouri C; Papoui A; Constantinidou A; Kitiris E; Kailides M; Stylianopoulos T
Acta Biomater; 2022 Dec; 154():324-334. PubMed ID: 36244596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer.
Plodinec M; Loparic M; Monnier CA; Obermann EC; Zanetti-Dallenbach R; Oertle P; Hyotyla JT; Aebi U; Bentires-Alj M; Lim RY; Schoenenberger CA
Nat Nanotechnol; 2012 Nov; 7(11):757-65. PubMed ID: 23085644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can measuring perilesional tissue stiffness and stiff rim sign improve the diagnostic performance between benign and malignant breast lesions?
Kong WT; Wang Y; Zhou WJ; Zhang YD; Wang WP; Zhuang XM; Wu M
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 33439373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions.
Altıntas Y; Bayrak M; Alabaz Ö; Celiktas M
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 33070635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of tissue elasticity in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using shear wave elastography.
Yang H; Xu Y; Zhao Y; Yin J; Chen Z; Huang P
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):930. PubMed ID: 32993571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a meta-analysis.
Gong X; Xu Q; Xu Z; Xiong P; Yan W; Chen Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Nov; 130(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 21870128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nanomechanical characterization of living mammary tissues by atomic force microscopy.
Plodinec M; Lim RY
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1293():231-46. PubMed ID: 26040692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Fat-to-Lesion Strain Ratio and the Gland-to-Lesion Strain Ratio With Controlled Precompression in Characterizing Indeterminate and Suspicious Breast Lesions on Ultrasound Imaging.
Chee C; Lombardo P; Schneider M; Danovani R
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Dec; 38(12):3257-3266. PubMed ID: 31140631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions : Our experience with QelaXtoTM software.
Pesce K; Binder F; Chico MJ; Swiecicki MP; Galindo DH; Terrasa S
J Ultrasound; 2020 Dec; 23(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 32529557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential of Lesion-to-Fat Elasticity Ratio Measured by Shear Wave Elastography to Reduce Benign Biopsies in BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions.
Togawa R; Pfob A; Büsch C; Alwafai Z; Balleyguier C; Clevert DA; Duda V; Fastner S; Goncalo M; Gomez C; Gruber I; Hahn M; Hennigs A; Kapetas P; Nees J; Ohlinger R; Riedel F; Rutten M; Schäfgen B; Stieber A; Tozaki M; Wojcinski S; Rauch G; Heil J; Barr R; Golatta M
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Aug; 42(8):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 36789976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: factors associated with false negative and false positive results.
Park SY; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3788-3798. PubMed ID: 28168373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elastography Complements Ultrasound as Principle Modality in Breast Lesion Assessment.
Redling K; Schwab F; Siebert M; Schötzau A; Zanetti-Dällenbach R
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 27078033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging.
Tanter M; Bercoff J; Athanasiou A; Deffieux T; Gennisson JL; Montaldo G; Muller M; Tardivon A; Fink M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1373-86. PubMed ID: 18395961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
