279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30411207)
1. Pupillometry tracks fluctuations in working memory performance.
Robison MK; Unsworth N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):407-419. PubMed ID: 30411207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study.
Unsworth N; Robison MK
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1962-1987. PubMed ID: 28504528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry.
Unsworth N; Robison MK
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):757-65. PubMed ID: 25324180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pupillary correlates of individual differences in n-back task performance.
Robison MK; Garner LD
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):799-807. PubMed ID: 38326632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patience is a virtue: Individual differences in cue-evoked pupil responses under temporal certainty.
Hood AVB; Hart KM; Marchak FM; Hutchison KA
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1286-1303. PubMed ID: 35396616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Examining the role of attentional allocation in working memory precision with pupillometry in children and adults.
Galeano-Keiner EM; Pakzad S; Brod G; Bunge SA
J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Jul; 231():105655. PubMed ID: 36863172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pupillary correlates of individual differences in long-term memory.
Robison MK; Trost JM; Schor D; Gibson BS; Healey MK
Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1355-1366. PubMed ID: 35355225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pupillary correlates of lapses of sustained attention.
Unsworth N; Robison MK
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 16(4):601-15. PubMed ID: 27038165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry.
Unsworth N; Robison MK
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 18(4):638-664. PubMed ID: 29654476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Foggy windows: Pupillary responses during task preparation.
Trani A; Verhaeghen P
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2235-2248. PubMed ID: 30226439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of lapses of attention on working memory capacity.
Unsworth N; Robison MK
Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 26450588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individual differences in resting-state pupil size: Evidence for association between working memory capacity and pupil size variability.
Aminihajibashi S; Hagen T; Foldal MD; Laeng B; Espeseth T
Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jun; 140():1-7. PubMed ID: 30894328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tracking working memory maintenance with pupillometry.
Unsworth N; Robison MK
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):461-484. PubMed ID: 29204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of cognitive abilities and task demands on tonic and phasic pupil sizes.
Aminihajibashi S; Hagen T; Andreassen OA; Laeng B; Espeseth T
Biol Psychol; 2020 Oct; 156():107945. PubMed ID: 32889001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Individual differences in working memory capacity and the regulation of arousal.
Robison MK; Brewer GA
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3273-3290. PubMed ID: 32651927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus.
Alnæs D; Sneve MH; Espeseth T; Endestad T; van de Pavert SH; Laeng B
J Vis; 2014 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 24692319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Your eyes give you away: prestimulus changes in pupil diameter correlate with poststimulus task-related EEG dynamics.
Hong L; Walz JM; Sajda P
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91321. PubMed ID: 24618591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.
Unsworth N; Robison MK
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1282-1311. PubMed ID: 28108977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of luminance on tonic and phasic pupillary responses to sustained cognitive load.
Peysakhovich V; Vachon F; Dehais F
Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Feb; 112():40-45. PubMed ID: 27979740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
