These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30412122)

  • 1. Branch ostial optimization treatment and optimized provisional t-stenting with polymeric bioresorbable scaffolds: Ex-vivo morphologic and hemodynamic examination.
    Cai W; Chen L; Zhang L; Tu S; Fan L; Chen Z; Luo Y; Zheng X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(43):e12972. PubMed ID: 30412122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Complex Coronary Bifurcation Interventions: Insights From an In Vivo Multimodality Imaging Study.
    Bennett J; Vanhaverbeke M; Vanden Driessche N; Adriaenssens T; Hiltrop N; Desmet W; Sinnaeve P; Dubois C
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 27512090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold in coronary bifurcations: insights from bench testing.
    Džavík V; Colombo A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 24332424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential Proximal Optimizing Technique in Provisional Bifurcation Stenting With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: Fractal Coronary Bifurcation Bench for Comparative Test Between Absorb and XIENCE Xpedition.
    Derimay F; Souteyrand G; Motreff P; Guerin P; Pilet P; Ohayon J; Darremont O; Rioufol G; Finet G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(13):1397-406. PubMed ID: 27388830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Side-Branch Dilation Techniques After Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold Implantation: A Bench Study.
    de Pommereau A; Mogi S; de Hemptinne Q; Adjedj J; Varenne O; Picard F
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 31(8):E249-E255. PubMed ID: 31368896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reversed single string technique for coronary bifurcation stenting-First report of case demonstrations in vitro.
    Adjedj J; Toth GG; Pellicano M; Wijns W
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):396-401. PubMed ID: 28508393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The drug-eluting resorbable magnesium vascular scaffold in complex coronary bifurcations: insights from an in vivo multimodality imaging study.
    Bennett J; Vanhaverbeke M; Vanden Driessche N; Hiltrop N; Adriaenssens T; Desmet W; Sinnaeve P; Dubois C
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Apr; 13(17):2036-2046. PubMed ID: 28741575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro flow and optical coherence tomography comparison of two bailout techniques after failed provisional stenting for bifurcation percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Adjedj J; Picard F; Mogi S; Iwasaki K; Aoumeur H; Alansari O; Agudze E; Wijns W; Varenne O
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 93(1):E8-E16. PubMed ID: 30351495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is it safe to implant bioresorbable scaffolds in ostial side-branch lesions? Impact of 'neo-carina' formation on main-branch flow pattern. Longitudinal clinical observations.
    Karanasos A; Li Y; Tu S; Wentzel JJ; Reiber JH; van Geuns RJ; Regar E
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jan; 238(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 25437885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds implanted in coronary bifurcation lesions: Impact of polymeric wide struts on side-branch impairment.
    De Paolis M; Felix C; van Ditzhuijzen N; Fam JM; Karanasos A; de Boer S; van Mieghem NM; Daemen J; Costa F; Bergoli LC; Ligthart JM; Regar E; de Jaegere PP; Zijlstra F; van Geuns RJ; Diletti R
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():656-64. PubMed ID: 27423087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three dimensional reconstruction of coronary artery stents from optical coherence tomography: experimental validation and clinical feasibility.
    Wu W; Khan B; Sharzehee M; Zhao S; Samant S; Watanabe Y; Murasato Y; Mickley T; Bicek A; Bliss R; Valenzuela T; Iaizzo PA; Makadia J; Panagopoulos A; Burzotta F; Samady H; Brilakis ES; Dangas GD; Louvard Y; Stankovic G; Dubini G; Migliavacca F; Kassab GS; Edelman ER; Chiastra C; Chatzizisis YS
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):12252. PubMed ID: 34112841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Analysis of Three Different Optimization Procedures for Coronary Bifurcation Provisional Stenting: Insights from Micro-Computed Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Bench Deployments.
    Cai W; Chen L; Zhang L; Fan L; Chen Z; Luo Y; Zheng X
    Acta Cardiol Sin; 2019 Jul; 35(4):369-379. PubMed ID: 31371897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Salvage of side branch by provisional "TAP technique" using Absorb™ bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for bifurcation lesions: first case reports with technical considerations.
    Seth A; Sengottuvelu G; Ravisekar V
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 84(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 24677764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified T-stenting with intentional protrusion of the side-branch stent within the main vessel stent to ensure ostial coverage and facilitate final kissing balloon: the T-stenting and small protrusion technique (TAP-stenting). Report of bench testing and first clinical Italian-Korean two-centre experience.
    Burzotta F; Gwon HC; Hahn JY; Romagnoli E; Choi JH; Trani C; Colombo A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jul; 70(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 17585382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multimodality imaging results of TAP versus novel modified TAP stenting in coronary bifurcation: From bench testing to first-in-man investigation.
    Ng JCK; Ang H; Zhong L; Hakim D; Marmagkiolis K; Foin N; Leesar MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Jan; 101(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 36403271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Procedural findings and early healing response after implantation of a self-apposing bioresorbable scaffold in coronary bifurcation lesions.
    Holck EN; Fox-Maule C; Barkholt TØ; Jakobsen L; Tu S; Maeng M; Dijkstra J; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 35(7):1199-1210. PubMed ID: 31053981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Analysis of Sequential Proximal Optimizing Technique Versus Kissing Balloon Inflation Technique in Provisional Bifurcation Stenting: Fractal Coronary Bifurcation Bench Test.
    Finet G; Derimay F; Motreff P; Guerin P; Pilet P; Ohayon J; Darremont O; Rioufol G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(10):1308-1317. PubMed ID: 26315733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of ostial side branch damage during provisional stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions not involving the side branch origin: an ultrasonographic study.
    Suárez de Lezo J; Medina A; Martín P; Novoa J; Suárez de Lezo J; Pan M; Caballero E; Melián F; Mazuelos F; Quevedo V
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Feb; 7(10):1147-54. PubMed ID: 22030298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the hemodynamic characteristics of Absorb BVS in a porcine coronary artery model.
    Tenekecioglu E; Torii R; Bourantas C; Abdelghani M; Cavalcante R; Sotomi Y; Crake T; Su S; Santoso T; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 227():467-473. PubMed ID: 27839816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical coherence tomography guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds.
    Caiazzo G; Longo G; Giavarini A; Kilic ID; Fabris E; Serdoz R; Mattesini A; Foin N; Secco GG; De Rosa S; Indolfi C; Di Mario C
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():352-8. PubMed ID: 27404705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.