BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30412281)

  • 1. Evaluation of a validated methylation triage signature for human papillomavirus positive women in the HPV FOCAL cervical cancer screening trial.
    Cook DA; Krajden M; Brentnall AR; Gondara L; Chan T; Law JH; Smith LW; van Niekerk DJ; Ogilvie GS; Coldman AJ; Warman R; Reuter C; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT
    Int J Cancer; 2019 May; 144(10):2587-2595. PubMed ID: 30412281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methylation estimates the risk of precancer in HPV-infected women with discrepant results between cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping.
    Hernández-López R; Lorincz AT; Torres-Ibarra L; Reuter C; Scibior-Bentkowska D; Warman R; Nedjai B; Mendiola-Pastrana I; León-Maldonado L; Rivera-Paredez B; Ramírez-Palacios P; Lazcano-Ponce E; Cuzick J; Salmerón J;
    Clin Epigenetics; 2019 Oct; 11(1):140. PubMed ID: 31606044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA methylation testing with S5 for triage of high-risk HPV positive women.
    Adcock R; Nedjai B; Lorincz AT; Scibior-Bentkowska D; Banwait R; Torrez-Martinez N; Robertson M; Cuzick J; Wheeler CM;
    Int J Cancer; 2022 Oct; 151(7):993-1004. PubMed ID: 35477862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effective methylation triage of HPV positive women with abnormal cytology in a middle-income country.
    Ramírez AT; Sánchez GI; Nedjai B; Agudelo MC; Brentnall AR; Cuschieri K; Castañeda KM; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT;
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Mar; 148(6):1383-1393. PubMed ID: 33006394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.
    Aoyama-Kikawa S; Fujita H; Hanley SJB; Kasamo M; Kikuchi K; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Tamakoshi A; Sasaki T; Matsuura M; Kato Y; Dong P; Watari H; Saito T; Sengoku K; Sakuragi N
    Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary screening for cervical cancer based on high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection and HPV 16 and HPV 18 genotyping, in comparison to cytology.
    Agorastos T; Chatzistamatiou K; Katsamagkas T; Koliopoulos G; Daponte A; Constantinidis T; Constantinidis TC;
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119755. PubMed ID: 25793281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
    Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
    Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
    PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening with limited genotyping.
    Trzeszcz M; Mazurec M; Jach R; Mazurec K; Kotkowska-Szeps I; Kania M; Wantuchowicz M; Wasowska J; Duczek-Polakiewicz M; Rozmus P; Streb J; Halon A
    J Med Virol; 2023 Nov; 95(11):e29271. PubMed ID: 38009626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-specific effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus screening versus cytology in a cervical cancer screening program: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
    Bao H; Ma L; Zhao Y; Song B; Di J; Wang L; Gao Y; Ren W; Wang S; Wu J; Wang HJ
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2022 Mar; 42(3):191-204. PubMed ID: 35142100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of partial genotyping with HPV16/18 for triage of HPV positive, cytology negative women in the COMPACT study.
    Hanley SJB; Fujita H; Aoyama-Kikawa S; Kasamo M; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Noriaki S;
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 32(6):e86. PubMed ID: 34708593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of DNA methylation assays for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kelly H; Benavente Y; Pavon MA; De Sanjose S; Mayaud P; Lorincz AT
    Br J Cancer; 2019 Nov; 121(11):954-965. PubMed ID: 31616037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting.
    Poljak M; Oštrbenk A; Seme K; Šterbenc A; Jančar N; Vrtačnik Bokal E
    J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S29-S39. PubMed ID: 26643051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Triage options to manage high-risk human papillomavirus-positive women: A population-based cross-sectional study from rural China.
    Rezhake R; Chen F; Hu SY; Zhao XL; Zhang X; Cao J; Qiao YL; Zhao FH; Arbyn M
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Oct; 147(8):2053-2064. PubMed ID: 32249409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Follow-up of high-risk HPV positive women by combined cytology and bi-marker CADM1/MAL methylation analysis on cervical scrapes.
    Verhoef VM; van Kemenade FJ; Rozendaal L; Heideman DA; Bosgraaf RP; Hesselink AT; Melchers WJ; Massuger LF; Bekkers RL; Steenbergen RD; Berkhof J; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 137(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 25667975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Triage performance and predictive value of the human gene methylation panel among women positive on self-collected HPV test: Results from a prospective cohort study.
    Zhang L; Zhao X; Hu S; Chen S; Zhao S; Dong L; Carvalho AL; Muwonge R; Zhao F; Basu P
    Int J Cancer; 2022 Sep; 151(6):878-887. PubMed ID: 35460075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of human papillomavirus 16/18 oncoprotein test for cervical cancer screening and HPV positive women triage.
    Yu L; Jiang M; Qu P; Wu Z; Sun P; Xi M; Qin Y; Liu X; Liao G; Lei X; Sun L; Zhang Y; Li Z; Chen W; Qiao YL
    Int J Cancer; 2018 Aug; 143(4):813-822. PubMed ID: 29524206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical performance of methylation as a biomarker for cervical carcinoma in situ and cancer diagnosis: A worldwide study.
    Banila C; Lorincz AT; Scibior-Bentkowska D; Clifford GM; Kumbi B; Beyene D; Wheeler CM; Cuschieri K; Cuzick J; Nedjai B
    Int J Cancer; 2022 Jan; 150(2):290-302. PubMed ID: 34562270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.