BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30412332)

  • 1. Harvesting effects on wild bee communities in bioenergy grasslands depend on nesting guild.
    Spiesman BJ; Bennett A; Isaacs R; Gratton C
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Mar; 29(2):e01828. PubMed ID: 30412332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-scalar drivers of biodiversity: local management mediates wild bee community response to regional urbanization.
    Ballare KM; Neff JL; Ruppel R; Jha S
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Apr; 29(3):e01869. PubMed ID: 30892745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fragmentation of nest and foraging habitat affects time budgets of solitary bees, their fitness and pollination services, depending on traits: Results from an individual-based model.
    Everaars J; Settele J; Dormann CF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0188269. PubMed ID: 29444076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Profiling crop pollinators: life history traits predict habitat use and crop visitation by Mediterranean wild bees.
    Pisanty G; Mandelik Y
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):742-52. PubMed ID: 26214919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Floral and nesting resources, habitat structure, and fire influence bee distribution across an open-forest gradient.
    Grundel R; Jean RP; Frohnapple KJ; Glowacki GA; Scott PE; Pavlovic NB
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1678-92. PubMed ID: 20945767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Livestock grazing is associated with seasonal reduction in pollinator biodiversity and functional dispersion but cheatgrass invasion is not: Variation in bee assemblages in a multi-use shortgrass prairie.
    Thapa-Magar KB; Davis TS; Kondratieff B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0237484. PubMed ID: 33332351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rangeland sharing by cattle and bees: moderate grazing does not impair bee communities and resource availability.
    Shapira T; Henkin Z; Dag A; Mandelik Y
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Apr; 30(3):e02066. PubMed ID: 31872932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) pollination in California's Central Valley is limited by native bee nest site location.
    Sardiñas HS; Tom K; Ponisio LC; Rominger A; Kremen C
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Mar; 26(2):438-47. PubMed ID: 27209786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dryland Organic Farming Partially Offsets Negative Effects of Highly Simplified Agricultural Landscapes on Forbs, Bees, and Bee-Flower Networks.
    Adhikari S; Burkle LA; O'Neill KM; Weaver DK; Delphia CM; Menalled FD
    Environ Entomol; 2019 Aug; 48(4):826-835. PubMed ID: 31144714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current and previous spatial distributions of oilseed rape fields influence the abundance and the body size of a solitary wild bee, Andrena cineraria, in permanent grasslands.
    Van Reeth C; Caro G; Bockstaller C; Michel N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197684. PubMed ID: 29787595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resource overlap and possible competition between honey bees and wild bees in central Europe.
    Steffan-Dewenter I; Tscharntke T
    Oecologia; 2000 Feb; 122(2):288-296. PubMed ID: 28308384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling pollinator community response to contrasting bioenergy scenarios.
    Bennett AB; Meehan TD; Gratton C; Isaacs R
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110676. PubMed ID: 25365559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cattle and sheep differentially alter floral resources and the native bee communities in working landscapes.
    Cutter J; Geaumont B; McGranahan D; Harmon J; Limb R; Schauer C; Hovick T
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02406. PubMed ID: 34245625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trait-specific responses of wild bee communities to landscape composition, configuration and local factors.
    Hopfenmüller S; Steffan-Dewenter I; Holzschuh A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104439. PubMed ID: 25137311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limited phenological and dietary overlap between bee communities in spring flowering crops and herbaceous enhancements.
    Wood TJ; Gibbs J; Rothwell N; Wilson JK; Gut L; Brokaw J; Isaacs R
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Oct; 28(7):1924-1934. PubMed ID: 30184292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrasting Pollinators and Pollination in Native and Non-Native Regions of Highbush Blueberry Production.
    Gibbs J; Elle E; Bobiwash K; Haapalainen T; Isaacs R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158937. PubMed ID: 27391969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complementary crops and landscape features sustain wild bee communities.
    Martins KT; Albert CH; Lechowicz MJ; Gonzalez A
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Jun; 28(4):1093-1105. PubMed ID: 29495110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of urbanization on bee communities depends on floral resource availability and bee functional traits.
    Wilson CJ; Jamieson MA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225852. PubMed ID: 31790482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wildflower plantings enhance nesting opportunities for soil-nesting bees.
    Williams NM; Buderi A; Rowe L; Ward K
    Ecol Appl; 2024 Mar; 34(2):e2935. PubMed ID: 38071699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Roles of scale, matrix, and native habitat in supporting a diverse suburban pollinator assemblage.
    Hinners SJ; Kearns CA; Wessman CA
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Oct; 22(7):1923-35. PubMed ID: 23210309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.