These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30412449)

  • 1. Mode of Delivery Preference Among Pregnant Nulliparous Women.
    Kjerulff KH; Attanasio LB; Edmonds JK; Repke JT
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Jun; 28(6):874-884. PubMed ID: 30412449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran.
    Rajabi A; Maharlouei N; Rezaianzadeh A; Rajaeefard A; Keshavarzi S; Lankarani KB; Gholami A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3622-8. PubMed ID: 26753876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's preference for vaginal birth after a first delivery by cesarean.
    Attanasio LB; Kozhimannil KB; Kjerulff KH
    Birth; 2019 Mar; 46(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 30051510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery.
    Wu E; Kaimal AJ; Houston K; Yee LM; Nakagawa S; Kuppermann M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 210(5):440.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24246523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system.
    Dweik D; Girasek E; Töreki A; Mészáros G; Pál A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24575805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal preference for cesarean delivery: do women get what they want?
    Fuglenes D; Aas E; Botten G; Øian P; Kristiansen IS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 120(2 Pt 1):252-60. PubMed ID: 22825082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Women's preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study.
    Mazzoni A; Althabe F; Gutierrez L; Gibbons L; Liu NH; Bonotti AM; Izbizky GH; Ferrary M; Viergue N; Vigil SI; Zalazar Denett G; Belizán JM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():34. PubMed ID: 26857448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway.
    Lindstad Løvåsmoen EM; Nyland Bjørgo M; Lukasse M; Schei B; Henriksen L
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():206-212. PubMed ID: 29804768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear.
    Fuglenes D; Aas E; Botten G; Øian P; Kristiansen IS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 205(1):45.e1-9. PubMed ID: 21620366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors associated with Chinese nulliparous women's choices of mode of delivery: A longitudinal study.
    Zhang Z; Gu C; Zhu X; Ding Y; Simone S; Wang X; Tao H
    Midwifery; 2018 Jul; 62():42-48. PubMed ID: 29653417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Change of childbirth preference after delivery among nulliparous Chinese women and their partners.
    Li WY; Liabsuetrakul T; Stray-Pedersen B
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jan; 40(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 24102777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mode of delivery and postpartum depression: the role of patient preferences.
    Houston KA; Kaimal AJ; Nakagawa S; Gregorich SE; Yee LM; Kuppermann M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25218957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with Chinese pregnant women's preference for a cesarean section based on the theory of planned behaviour.
    Sun N; Yin X; Qiu L; Yang Q; Shi X; Chang J; Feng L; Gong Y
    Trop Med Int Health; 2020 Feb; 25(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 31677204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Knowledge and Preference Towards Mode of Delivery among Pregnant Women in the United Arab Emirates: The Mutaba'ah Study.
    Al-Rifai RH; Elbarazi I; Ali N; Loney T; Oulhaj A; Ahmed LA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33374611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Labor induction and cesarean delivery: A prospective cohort study of first births in Pennsylvania, USA.
    Kjerulff KH; Attanasio LB; Edmonds JK; Kozhimannil KB; Repke JT
    Birth; 2017 Sep; 44(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 28321899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How did you choose a mode of birth? Experiences of nulliparous women from Turkey.
    Boz İ; Teskereci G; Akman G
    Women Birth; 2016 Aug; 29(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 26846560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pregnant women's preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth - a six-country cohort study.
    Ryding EL; Lukasse M; Kristjansdottir H; Steingrimsdottir T; Schei B;
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Sep; 37(3):75-83. PubMed ID: 27269591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-medical determinants of cesarean section in a medically dominated maternity system.
    Dweik D; Girasek E; Mészáros G; Töreki A; Keresztúri A; Pál A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1025-33. PubMed ID: 25066090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women.
    Yee LM; Kaimal AJ; Houston KA; Wu E; Thiet MP; Nakagawa S; Caughey AB; Firouzian A; Kuppermann M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):377.e1-24. PubMed ID: 25446662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.