These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3041341)

  • 21. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP dental x-ray film holder and orientation devices in dentistry.
    Mamoun JS
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(1):8, 10, 12-4 passim. PubMed ID: 21443076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors influencing the design of aiming devices for intraoral radiography and their practical application.
    van Aken J; Verhoeven JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Apr; 47(4):378-88. PubMed ID: 285405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modified intraoral film holders for postmortem identification.
    Oeschger MP; Hubar JS
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Jul; 44(4):846-8. PubMed ID: 10432618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative analysis of errors in alveolar crest level caused by discrepant projection geometry in digital subtraction radiography: an in vivo study.
    Huh KH; Lee SS; Jeon IS; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Dec; 100(6):750-5. PubMed ID: 16301158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of radiographic technique upon prediction of tooth length in intraoral radiography.
    Bhakdinaronk A; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Jan; 51(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 6936683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography.
    Heo MS; Lee SS; Lee KH; Choi HM; Choi SC; Park TW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 11250638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ROI-based image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Huh KH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):523-9. PubMed ID: 16545718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of projections for subtraction radiography based on image similarity measurements.
    van der Stelt PF; Ruttimann UE; Webber RL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Aug; 18(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 2700350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new method for standardization of intraoral radiographs.
    Kiliç AR; Efeoglu E; Yilmaz S
    Periodontal Clin Investig; 1996; 18(2):20-6. PubMed ID: 9116467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of an opto-electronic positioning device for serial direct digital images of oral structures.
    Morea C; Langlotz F; Scheer C; Bürgin W; Nolte LP; Lang NP; Brägger U
    J Periodontal Res; 2000 Aug; 35(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 10983883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Problems around the in vitro and in vivo application of quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Janssen PT; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 May; 16(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 2656771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors.
    Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of technical parameters on image perception using two types of dental radiographs.
    Nielsen PM; Weber HP; zen Ruffinen S; Brecx M; Joss A; Lang NP
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1989; 99(7):777-81. PubMed ID: 2692154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sources of noise in digital subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A; Sewerin I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Apr; 71(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 2052339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methodological aspects and quantitative adjuncts to computerized subtraction radiography.
    McHenry K; Hausmann E; Wikesjö U; Dunford R; Lyon-Bottenfield E; Christersson L; Rosling B
    J Periodontal Res; 1987 Mar; 22(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 2953883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Intraoral radiographs of dental implants in the edentulous mandible].
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Jul; 102(7):258-62. PubMed ID: 11837109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Image homogeneity and recording reproducibility with 2 techniques for serial intra-oral radiography.
    Sander L; Wenzel A; Hintze H; Karring T
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1288-91. PubMed ID: 8997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.