These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3041341)

  • 41. Image homogeneity and recording reproducibility with 2 techniques for serial intra-oral radiography.
    Sander L; Wenzel A; Hintze H; Karring T
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1288-91. PubMed ID: 8997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Computed dental radiography: evaluation of a new charge-coupled device-based intraoral radiographic system.
    Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Schick DB; Rumack PM
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 8602420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Personal computer equipment for dental digital subtraction radiography vs. industrial computer equipment and conventional radiography.
    Möystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Apr; 100(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 1574677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The universal U and L bite-block film holder. A method of positioning and holding intraoral X-ray films for both maxillary and mandibular exposures.
    CARR JD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1961 Aug; 14():954-60. PubMed ID: 13690997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of radiographic technique using a new customized film holder for dental implant assessment.
    Aparecida de Mattias Sartori I; da Silveira Junior CD; Fontão FN; da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M
    Implant Dent; 2014 Feb; 23(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 24384739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: In vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery.
    Nilsson J; Richards RG; Thor A; Kamer L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 27423538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants.
    De Smet E; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Naert I
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 12058265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reliability of a paralleling instrument for dental radiographs.
    Dubrez B; Jacot-Descombes S; Cimasoni G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 7489281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films.
    Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Subtraction radiography.
    Vannier MW
    J Periodontol; 1996 Sep; 67(9):949-50. PubMed ID: 8884654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Modification designed to improve instruction in intraoral dental radiography.
    Choksi SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Jun; 59(6):653-8. PubMed ID: 3859828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Direct digital dental x-ray imaging with visualix/VIXA.
    Molteni R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Aug; 76(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 8361738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Digital radiography: an overview.
    Parks ET; Williamson GF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Nov; 3(4):23-39. PubMed ID: 12444400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Digital radiology for implant treatment planning and evaluation.
    Jeffcoat MK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Nov; 21(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 1299635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sensor noise in direct digital imaging (the RadioVisioGraphy, Sens-a-Ray, and Visualix/Vixa systems) evaluated by subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 8108102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth.
    Giménez B; Özcan M; Martínez-Rus F; Pradíes G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e54-64. PubMed ID: 23879869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Advances in imaging in oral medicine.
    Miles DA
    Alpha Omegan; 2001; 94(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 11480184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.