These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30414925)

  • 1. Integration of Tumor Genomic Data with Cell Lines Using Multi-dimensional Network Modules Improves Cancer Pharmacogenomics.
    Webber JT; Kaushik S; Bandyopadhyay S
    Cell Syst; 2018 Nov; 7(5):526-536.e6. PubMed ID: 30414925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integration of somatic mutation, expression and functional data reveals potential driver genes predictive of breast cancer survival.
    Suo C; Hrydziuszko O; Lee D; Pramana S; Saputra D; Joshi H; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(16):2607-13. PubMed ID: 25810432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrative pathway-based survival prediction utilizing the interaction between gene expression and DNA methylation in breast cancer.
    Kim SY; Kim TR; Jeong HH; Sohn KA
    BMC Med Genomics; 2018 Sep; 11(Suppl 3):68. PubMed ID: 30255812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous Integration of Multi-omics Data Improves the Identification of Cancer Driver Modules.
    Silverbush D; Cristea S; Yanovich-Arad G; Geiger T; Beerenwinkel N; Sharan R
    Cell Syst; 2019 May; 8(5):456-466.e5. PubMed ID: 31103572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Systemic Analysis of Transcriptomic and Epigenomic Data To Reveal Regulation Patterns for Complex Disease.
    Xu C; Zhang JG; Lin D; Zhang L; Shen H; Deng HW
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jul; 7(7):2271-2279. PubMed ID: 28500050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA Methylation Module Network-Based Prognosis and Molecular Typing of Cancer.
    Cui ZJ; Zhou XH; Zhang HY
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Jul; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 31357729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple network algorithm for epigenetic modules via the integration of genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data.
    Ma X; Liu Z; Zhang Z; Huang X; Tang W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 28137264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
    Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating multi-omics data by learning modality invariant representations for improved prediction of overall survival of cancer.
    Tong L; Wu H; Wang MD
    Methods; 2021 May; 189():74-85. PubMed ID: 32763377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of a co‑expression network for the analysis of aggressive and non‑aggressive breast cancer cell lines to predict the clinical outcome of patients.
    Guo L; Zhang K; Bing Z
    Mol Med Rep; 2017 Dec; 16(6):7967-7978. PubMed ID: 28944917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discovery of two-level modular organization from matched genomic data via joint matrix tri-factorization.
    Chen J; Zhang S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(12):5967-5976. PubMed ID: 29878151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian variable selection with graphical structure learning: Applications in integrative genomics.
    Kundu S; Cheng Y; Shin M; Manyam G; Mallick BK; Baladandayuthapani V
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0195070. PubMed ID: 30059495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying multi-layer gene regulatory modules from multi-dimensional genomic data.
    Li W; Zhang S; Liu CC; Zhou XJ
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Oct; 28(19):2458-66. PubMed ID: 22863767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Integrative Approach for Identifying Network Biomarkers of Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Genomic, Interactomic, and Transcriptomic Data.
    Firoozbakht F; Rezaeian I; D'agnillo M; Porter L; Rueda L; Ngom A
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):756-766. PubMed ID: 28650678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gene co-expression analysis identifies common modules related to prognosis and drug resistance in cancer cell lines.
    Liu W; Li L; Li W
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Dec; 135(12):2795-803. PubMed ID: 24771271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A signal-based method for finding driver modules of breast cancer metastasis to the lung.
    Yan G; Chen V; Lu X; Lu S
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):10023. PubMed ID: 28855549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of key gene modules and pathways of human breast cancer by co-expression analysis.
    Zhao Q; Song W; He DY; Li Y
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Mar; 25(2):213-223. PubMed ID: 29170883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A computational method for clinically relevant cancer stratification and driver mutation module discovery using personal genomics profiles.
    Wang L; Li F; Sheng J; Wong ST
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S6. PubMed ID: 26099165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Integrative Method Based on the Module-Network for Identifying Driver Genes in Cancer Subtypes.
    Lu X; Li X; Liu P; Qian X; Miao Q; Peng S
    Molecules; 2018 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 29364829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlating transcriptional networks with pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
    Liu R; Lv QL; Yu J; Hu L; Zhang LH; Cheng Y; Zhou HH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 151(3):607-18. PubMed ID: 25981901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.