These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30415075)

  • 1. Impact of Multi-Institutional Prospective Peer Review on Target and Organ-at-Risk Delineation in Radiation Therapy.
    Riegel AC; Vaccarelli M; Cox BW; Chou H; Cao Y; Potters L
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2019 Mar; 9(2):e228-e235. PubMed ID: 30415075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of peer review of volume delineation in stereotactic body radiation therapy planning for primary lung cancer: a multicenter quality assurance study.
    Lo AC; Liu M; Chan E; Lund C; Truong PT; Loewen S; Cao J; Schellenberg D; Carolan H; Berrang T; Wu J; Berthelet E; Olson R
    J Thorac Oncol; 2014 Apr; 9(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 24736076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standardizing Normal Tissue Contouring for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning: An ASTRO Consensus Paper.
    Wright JL; Yom SS; Awan MJ; Dawes S; Fischer-Valuck B; Kudner R; Mailhot Vega R; Rodrigues G
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2019 Mar; 9(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 30576843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of treatment planning workflow and tumor coverage during daily adaptive magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) of pancreatic cancer.
    Olberg S; Green O; Cai B; Yang D; Rodriguez V; Zhang H; Kim JS; Parikh PJ; Mutic S; Park JC
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Mar; 13(1):51. PubMed ID: 29573744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer Review of Radiotherapy Planning: Quantifying Outcomes and a Proposal for Prospective Data Collection.
    Mackenzie J; Graham G; Olivotto IA
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Dec; 28(12):e192-e198. PubMed ID: 27633327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
    Sayre GA; Ruan D
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
    Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simultaneous integrated protection : A new concept for high-precision radiation therapy.
    Brunner TB; Nestle U; Adebahr S; Gkika E; Wiehle R; Baltas D; Grosu AL
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Dec; 192(12):886-894. PubMed ID: 27757502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiotherapy for early mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma according to the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG): the roles of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and involved-node radiotherapy.
    Koeck J; Abo-Madyan Y; Lohr F; Stieler F; Kriz J; Mueller RP; Wenz F; Eich HT
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 22079733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Peer Review Quality Assurance Rounds Incorporating Direct Physical Examination for Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy.
    Cardenas CE; Mohamed ASR; Tao R; Wong AJR; Awan MJ; Kuruvila S; Aristophanous M; Gunn GB; Phan J; Beadle BM; Frank SJ; Garden AS; Morrison WH; Fuller CD; Rosenthal DI
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):532-540. PubMed ID: 28258898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.
    Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of Peer Review in the Radiation Treatment Planning Process: Experience of a Tertiary Care University Hospital in Pakistan.
    Qureshi BM; Mansha MA; Karim MU; Hafiz A; Ali N; Mirkhan B; Shaukat F; Tariq M; Abbasi AN
    J Glob Oncol; 2019 Aug; 5():1-7. PubMed ID: 31393752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
    Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of quality assurance rounds in a Canadian radiation therapy department.
    Lefresne S; Olivotto IA; Joe H; Blood PA; Olson RA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(3):e117-21. PubMed ID: 23195781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans Using a ⁶⁰Co Magnetic Resonance Image Guidance Radiation Therapy System.
    Wooten HO; Green O; Yang M; DeWees T; Kashani R; Olsen J; Michalski J; Yang D; Tanderup K; Hu Y; Li HH; Mutic S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(4):771-8. PubMed ID: 26104932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Directly Improving the Quality of Radiation Treatment Through Peer Review: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Cancer Centers Across a Provincial Cancer Program.
    Rouette J; Gutierrez E; O'Donnell J; Reddeman L; Hart M; Foxcroft S; Mitera G; Warde P; Brundage MD; ;
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 28258891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of Multi-Criteria Optimization-based Trade-Off exploration in combination with RapidPlan for head & neck radiotherapy planning.
    Miguel-Chumacero E; Currie G; Johnston A; Currie S
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Nov; 13(1):229. PubMed ID: 30470254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Processes for the Assessment of Radiation Target Volumes in Head and Neck Cancer.
    Gogineni E; Schaefer D; Ewing A; Andraos T; DiCostanzo D; Weldon M; Christ D; Baliga S; Jhawar S; Mitchell D; Grecula J; Konieczkowski DJ; Palmer J; Jahraus T; Dibs K; Chakravarti A; Martin D; Gamez ME; Blakaj D
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2024; 14(3):e205-e213. PubMed ID: 38237893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of a real time group consensus peer review process in radiation oncology: an evaluation of effectiveness and feasibility.
    Albert AA; Duggar WN; Bhandari RP; Vengaloor Thomas T; Packianathan S; Allbright RM; Kanakamedala MR; Mehta D; Yang CC; Vijayakumar S
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):239. PubMed ID: 30509283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A patient-specific planning target volume used in 'plan of the day' adaptation for interfractional motion mitigation.
    Chen W; Gemmel A; Rietzel E
    J Radiat Res; 2013 Jul; 54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i82-90. PubMed ID: 23824132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.