371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30415285)
1. Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.
Rizzi A; Murkli S; McNeill JN; Yao W; Sullivan M; Gilson MK; Chiu MW; Isaacs L; Gibb BC; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):937-963. PubMed ID: 30415285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge.
Papadourakis M; Bosisio S; Michel J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 30159717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absolute binding free energies for the SAMPL6 cucurbit[8]uril host-guest challenge via the AMOEBA polarizable force field.
Laury ML; Wang Z; Gordon AS; Ponder JW
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 30324303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.
Muddana HS; Fenley AT; Mobley DL; Gilson MK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 24599514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.
Amezcua M; El Khoury L; Mobley DL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 33392951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?
Yin J; Henriksen NM; Slochower DR; Shirts MR; Chiu MW; Mobley DL; Gilson MK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 27658802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thermodynamic integration to predict host-guest binding affinities.
Lawrenz M; Wereszczynski J; Ortiz-Sánchez JM; Nichols SE; McCammon JA
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 22350568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Converging free energies of binding in cucurbit[7]uril and octa-acid host-guest systems from SAMPL4 using expanded ensemble simulations.
Monroe JI; Shirts MR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 24610238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blind prediction of binding affinities for charged supramolecular host-guest systems: achievements and shortcomings of DFT-D3.
Sure R; Antony J; Grimme S
J Phys Chem B; 2014 Mar; 118(12):3431-40. PubMed ID: 24588346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the fly estimation of host-guest binding free energies using the movable type method: participation in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.
Bansal N; Zheng Z; Cerutti DS; Merz KM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 27699553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.
Amezcua M; Setiadi J; Ge Y; Mobley DL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Oct; 36(10):707-734. PubMed ID: 36229622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.
Han K; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Nishikawa N; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 30084077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.
Yin J; Henriksen NM; Slochower DR; Gilson MK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):133-145. PubMed ID: 27638809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale.
Hudson PS; Han K; Woodcock HL; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):983-999. PubMed ID: 30276502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blind prediction of host-guest binding affinities: a new SAMPL3 challenge.
Muddana HS; Varnado CD; Bielawski CW; Urbach AR; Isaacs L; Geballe MT; Gilson MK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):475-87. PubMed ID: 22366955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A General Picture of Cucurbit[8]uril Host-Guest Binding.
Sun Z; Huai Z; He Q; Liu Z
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Dec; 61(12):6107-6134. PubMed ID: 34818004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.
Sun Z; He Q; Li X; Zhu Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):589-600. PubMed ID: 31974852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
