BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30415341)

  • 1. DNA Break Repair in Plants and Its Application for Genome Engineering.
    Schmidt C; Pacher M; Puchta H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1864():237-266. PubMed ID: 30415341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designed nucleases for targeted genome editing.
    Lee J; Chung JH; Kim HM; Kim DW; Kim H
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2016 Feb; 14(2):448-62. PubMed ID: 26369767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Plant DNA Repair Pathways and Their Applications in Genome Engineering.
    Que Q; Chen Z; Kelliher T; Skibbe D; Dong S; Chilton MD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1917():3-24. PubMed ID: 30610624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Homology-based double-strand break-induced genome engineering in plants.
    Steinert J; Schiml S; Puchta H
    Plant Cell Rep; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1429-38. PubMed ID: 27084537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining.
    Maruyama T; Dougan SK; Truttmann MC; Bilate AM; Ingram JR; Ploegh HL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2015 May; 33(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 25798939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene Editing With TALEN and CRISPR/Cas in Rice.
    Bi H; Yang B
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2017; 149():81-98. PubMed ID: 28712502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future.
    Puchta H; Fauser F
    Plant J; 2014 Jun; 78(5):727-41. PubMed ID: 24112784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-Strand Annealing Plays a Major Role in Double-Strand DNA Break Repair following CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage in
    Zhang WW; Matlashewski G
    mSphere; 2019 Aug; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31434745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulating DNA Repair Pathways to Improve Precision Genome Engineering.
    Pawelczak KS; Gavande NS; VanderVere-Carozza PS; Turchi JJ
    ACS Chem Biol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):389-396. PubMed ID: 29210569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CRISPR/Cas9; A robust technology for producing genetically engineered plants.
    Farooq R; Hussain K; Nazir S; Javed MR; Masood N
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2018 Nov; 64(14):31-38. PubMed ID: 30511631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From classical mutagenesis to nuclease-based breeding - directing natural DNA repair for a natural end-product.
    Pacher M; Puchta H
    Plant J; 2017 May; 90(4):819-833. PubMed ID: 28027431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Highly efficient CRISPR/HDR-mediated knock-in for mouse embryonic stem cells and zygotes.
    Wang B; Li K; Wang A; Reiser M; Saunders T; Lockey RF; Wang JW
    Biotechniques; 2015 Oct; 59(4):201-2, 204, 206-8. PubMed ID: 26458548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revisiting CRISPR/Cas-mediated crop improvement: Special focus on nutrition.
    Kaul T; Sony SK; Verma R; Motelb KFA; Prakash AT; Eswaran M; Bharti J; Nehra M; Kaul R
    J Biosci; 2020; 45():. PubMed ID: 33361628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CRISPR-Cas9; an efficient tool for precise plant genome editing.
    Islam W
    Mol Cell Probes; 2018 Jun; 39():47-52. PubMed ID: 29621557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Zinc finger nuclease-mediated targeting of multiple transgenes to an endogenous soybean genomic locus via non-homologous end joining.
    Bonawitz ND; Ainley WM; Itaya A; Chennareddy SR; Cicak T; Effinger K; Jiang K; Mall TK; Marri PR; Samuel JP; Sardesai N; Simpson M; Folkerts O; Sarria R; Webb SR; Gonzalez DO; Simmonds DH; Pareddy DR
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2019 Apr; 17(4):750-761. PubMed ID: 30220095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-Homologous End Joining and Homology Directed DNA Repair Frequency of Double-Stranded Breaks Introduced by Genome Editing Reagents.
    Zaboikin M; Zaboikina T; Freter C; Srinivasakumar N
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169931. PubMed ID: 28095454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Fauser F; Schiml S; Puchta H
    Plant J; 2014 Jul; 79(2):348-59. PubMed ID: 24836556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control of gene editing by manipulation of DNA repair mechanisms.
    Danner E; Bashir S; Yumlu S; Wurst W; Wefers B; Kühn R
    Mamm Genome; 2017 Aug; 28(7-8):262-274. PubMed ID: 28374058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9.
    Paquet D; Kwart D; Chen A; Sproul A; Jacob S; Teo S; Olsen KM; Gregg A; Noggle S; Tessier-Lavigne M
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7601):125-9. PubMed ID: 27120160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibition of 53BP1 favors homology-dependent DNA repair and increases CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing efficiency.
    Canny MD; Moatti N; Wan LCK; Fradet-Turcotte A; Krasner D; Mateos-Gomez PA; Zimmermann M; Orthwein A; Juang YC; Zhang W; Noordermeer SM; Seclen E; Wilson MD; Vorobyov A; Munro M; Ernst A; Ng TF; Cho T; Cannon PM; Sidhu SS; Sicheri F; Durocher D
    Nat Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 36(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 29176614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.