These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30415464)
1. Proximal femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Nocon AA; Sculco TP; Sculco PK; Bostrom MP Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2227-2233. PubMed ID: 30415464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss: a review of outcomes. Viste A; Perry KI; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP Bone Joint J; 2017 Mar; 99-B(3):325-329. PubMed ID: 28249971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with femoral bone loss using tapered rectangular femoral stem: a minimum 10 years' follow-up. Wang J; Dai WL; Lin ZM; Shi ZJ Hip Int; 2020 Sep; 30(5):622-628. PubMed ID: 32686507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of Gamma-irradiated proximal femoral allografts for bone stock reconstruction in complex revision hip arthroplasty. Nusem I; Morgan DA Hip Int; 2013; 23(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 23813172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proximal femoral replacement using the direct anterior approach to the hip. Thaler M; Manson TT; Holzapfel BM; Moskal J Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2022 Jun; 34(3):218-230. PubMed ID: 35641789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of femoral struts and impacted cancellous bone allograft in patients with severe femoral bone loss who undergo revision total hip replacement: a three- to nine-year follow-up. Buttaro MA; Costantini J; Comba F; Piccaluga F J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22323680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survivorship and clinical outcomes of proximal femoral replacement in non-neoplastic primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Mocini F; Cacciola G; Malerba G; Perisano C; De Martino I BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(Suppl 2):933. PubMed ID: 34749680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component. Amanatullah DF; Howard JL; Siman H; Trousdale RT; Mabry TM; Berry DJ Bone Joint J; 2015 Mar; 97-B(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 25737513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Desy NM; Johnson JD; Sierra RJ J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):494-498. PubMed ID: 27600303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modern Proximal Femoral Replacement in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Nononcologic Indications. Heckmann ND; Nakata HL; Chung BC; Baker JR; Longjohn DB; Christ AB; Oakes DA J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8S):S958-S963. PubMed ID: 35189288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What is the failure rate of constrained liners in complex revision total hip arthroplasty? Unter Ecker N; Piakong P; Delgado G; Gehrke T; Citak M; Ohlmeier M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar; 143(3):1671-1678. PubMed ID: 35377048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips. Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proximal femoral arthroplasty in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. March GM; Dehghan N; Gala L; Spangehl MJ; Kim PR J Arthroplasty; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2171-4. PubMed ID: 25134742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA. Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Medium- and long-term effectiveness of hip revision with SL-PLUS MIA stem in patients with Paprosky type Nuerailijiang Y; Li Y; Guo X; Wuhuzi W; Zhao X; Xu Z; Zhang X; Cao L Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Jul; 38(7):842-848. PubMed ID: 39013822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up. Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical results in early and mid term of using the S-ROM femoral stem in revision]. Piao S; Zhou YG; Du YQ; Ma HY; Sun JY; Gao ZS; Peng YW; Wu WM Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Apr; 30(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 29349981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Segmental proximal femoral bone loss and revision total hip replacement in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip: the role of allograft prosthesis composite. Sternheim A; Rogers BA; Kuzyk PR; Safir OA; Backstein D; Gross AE J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 22628589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of tripolar constrained total hip arthroplasty in revision hip arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of ten years. El-Husseiny M; Masri B; Duncan C; Garbuz DS Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun; 101-B(6_Supple_B):123-126. PubMed ID: 31146561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]