These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Conflicting interests involved in the process of publishing in biomedical journals. Igi R J BUON; 2015; 20(5):1373-7. PubMed ID: 26537088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers? Teixeira da Silva JA; Al-Khatib A Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):275-285. PubMed ID: 28155093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expanding Group Peer Review: A Proposal for Medical Education Scholarship. Dumenco L; Engle DL; Goodell K; Nagler A; Ovitsh RK; Whicker SA Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):147-149. PubMed ID: 27680319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing. Katz A Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Nov; 43(6):675-676. PubMed ID: 27768133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals. Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor. Jones AW Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review as professional responsibility: a quality control system only as good as the participants. Grainger DW Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(34):5199-203. PubMed ID: 17643484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process. Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review, authorship, ethics, and conflict of interest. King CR; McGuire DB; Longman AJ; Carroll-Johnson RM Image J Nurs Sch; 1997; 29(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 9212514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tips for writing and publishing an article. Nahata MC Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary. Tarkang EE; Bain LE Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rebound peer review: a viable recourse for aggrieved authors? Sen CK Antioxid Redox Signal; 2012 Feb; 16(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 22098370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process. Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]