These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30416719)

  • 1. Publishing peer review materials.
    Beck J; Funk K; Harrison M; McEntyre J; Breen J; Collings A; Donohoe P; Evans M; Flintoft L; Hamelers A; Hurst P; Lemberger T; Lin J; O'Connor N; Parkin M; Parker S; Rodgers P; Skipper M; Stoner M
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():1655. PubMed ID: 30416719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coached Peer Review: Developing the Next Generation of Authors.
    Sidalak D; Purdy E; Luckett-Gatopoulos S; Murray H; Thoma B; Chan TM
    Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):201-204. PubMed ID: 27191842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review.
    Laband DN; Piette MJ
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 8015128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eyes wide open: reader and author responsibility in understanding the limits of peer review.
    Benson PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 Oct; 97(7):487-9. PubMed ID: 26414359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical issues in biomedical publications.
    Kempers RD
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2001; 4(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 11719723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflicting interests involved in the process of publishing in biomedical journals.
    Igi R
    J BUON; 2015; 20(5):1373-7. PubMed ID: 26537088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?
    Teixeira da Silva JA; Al-Khatib A
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):275-285. PubMed ID: 28155093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
    Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expanding Group Peer Review: A Proposal for Medical Education Scholarship.
    Dumenco L; Engle DL; Goodell K; Nagler A; Ovitsh RK; Whicker SA
    Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):147-149. PubMed ID: 27680319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing.
    Katz A
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Nov; 43(6):675-676. PubMed ID: 27768133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
    Jones AW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review as professional responsibility: a quality control system only as good as the participants.
    Grainger DW
    Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(34):5199-203. PubMed ID: 17643484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Challenges for publishing Brazilian scientific health journals.
    Barata RB
    Cien Saude Colet; 2019 Mar; 24(3):929-939. PubMed ID: 30892514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process.
    Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E
    Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review, authorship, ethics, and conflict of interest.
    King CR; McGuire DB; Longman AJ; Carroll-Johnson RM
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1997; 29(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 9212514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
    Tarkang EE; Bain LE
    Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rebound peer review: a viable recourse for aggrieved authors?
    Sen CK
    Antioxid Redox Signal; 2012 Feb; 16(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 22098370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
    Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.