389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30417227)
1. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction.
Bataineh AB; Nusair YM; Al-Rahahleh RQ
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3239-3248. PubMed ID: 30417227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
Majid OW; Ahmed AM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical efficacy of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and articaine for local infiltration.
Srisurang S; Narit L; Prisana P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25427324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia.
Luqman U; Majeed Janjua OS; Ashfaq M; Irfan H; Mushtaq S; Bilal A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 25772957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Feasibility of permanent maxillary tooth removal using articaine anesthesia without palatal injection].
Peng M; Zhu ZM; Yang XM
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 26(4):416-8. PubMed ID: 18780504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.
Fan S; Chen WL; Yang ZH; Huang ZQ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 18996033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?
Uckan S; Dayangac E; Araz K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):733-5. PubMed ID: 17138173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extraction of Maxillary Teeth Using Articaine Without a Palatal Injection: A Comparison Between the Anterior and Posterior Regions of the Maxilla.
Bataineh AB; Al-Sabri GA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 75(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 27528103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial.
Rayati F; Haeri M; Norouziha A; Jabbarian R
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 59(6):695-699. PubMed ID: 34053801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Articaine Versus Lidocaine Concentration in the Palatal Tissues After Supraperiosteal Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia.
Al-Mahalawy H; Abuohashish H; Chathoth S; Al-Masoud N; Al-Jandan B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 76(2):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 29102601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children.
Mittal M; Sharma S; Kumar A; Chopra R; Srivastava D
Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 26883609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Efficacy of 4% Articaine Versus 2% Lidocaine in Inducing Palatal Anesthesia for Tooth Extraction in Different Maxillary Regions.
Gholami M; Banihashemrad A; Mohammadzadeh A; Ahrari F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 79(8):1643-1649. PubMed ID: 33757745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.
Rathi NV; Khatri AA; Agrawal AG; M SB; Thosar NR; Deolia SG
Anesth Prog; 2019; 66(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 30883236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulpal anesthesia of maxillary first molars using 4% articaine infiltration in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Afkhami F; Rostami G; Peters OA; Kamalian F
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3999-4006. PubMed ID: 37243822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Articaine use does not routinely eliminate the need for palatal injections for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized cross-over clinical trial.
Bahrololoomi Z; Maghsoudi N
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):603-611. PubMed ID: 34853915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 22414822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block.
Haase A; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M; Drum M
J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1228-35. PubMed ID: 18762633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the buccal injection versus buccal and palatal injection for extraction of permanent maxillary posterior teeth using 4% articaine: a split mouth study.
Iyengar AN; Dugal A; Ramanojam S; Patil VS; Limbhore M; Narla B; Mograwala HJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Apr; 59(3):281-285. PubMed ID: 33581884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
