These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3041796)

  • 21. Modified Herbst appliance for the mixed dentition.
    Goodman P; McKenna P
    J Clin Orthod; 1985 Nov; 19(11):811-4. PubMed ID: 3866762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Complications in Removable Mandibular Acrylic Splint and Cantilever Herbst for Management of Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Study.
    Kanuru RK; Bhasin V; Khatri A; Dodda KK; Singh E; Grover S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 May; 18(5):363-365. PubMed ID: 28512273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Management of the Herbst splint appliance in Class II malocclusion with different growth pattern.
    Schiavoni R; Grenga V
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19506745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The MARS appliance. Report of a case.
    Clements RM; Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Dec; 82(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 6961815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Windmiller EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bionators in Class II treatment.
    Altuna G; Niegel S
    J Clin Orthod; 1985 Mar; 19(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 3855861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of continuous bite jumping with the Herbst appliance on the masticatory system: a functional analysis of treated class II malocclusions.
    Pancherz H; Anehus-Pancherz M
    Eur J Orthod; 1982 Feb; 4(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 6950902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acrylic splint Herbst and Hanks telescoping Herbst: a retrospective study of emergencies, retreatments, treatment times and failures.
    Manni A; Cozzani M; Mazzotta L; Fiore VP; Mutinelli S
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):100-10. PubMed ID: 24485200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical management of the bonded Herbst appliance.
    Howe RP; McNamara JA
    J Clin Orthod; 1983 Jul; 17(7):456-63. PubMed ID: 6350359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance.
    Remmer KR; Mamandras AH; Hunter WS; Way DC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 3864370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changes of epiglottis and hyoid bone position after orthodontic treatment with cast splint fixed functional appliances.
    Hourfar J; Lisson JA; Kinzinger GSM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1525-1534. PubMed ID: 33409688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of the bionator appliance in the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion in the late mixed dentition.
    Tsamtsouris A; Vedrenne D
    J Pedod; 1983; 8(1):78-104. PubMed ID: 6584584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Fraenkel appliance--avoidance of lower incisor proclination.
    Eirew HL; McDowell F; Phillips JG
    Int J Orthod; 1986; 24(1-2):3-4. PubMed ID: 3457773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The maxillary orthopedic splint.
    Joffe L; Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 283694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Skeletal Class II treatment with the Chateau appliance.
    Craig WH; Petit HP; Chateau M
    J Pedod; 1987; 11(2):120-38. PubMed ID: 3546662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions through the use of the Bionator appliance. Report of two cases.
    Rutter RR; Witt E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 2301297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Retrospective study of clinical complications during orthodontic treatment with either a removable mandibular acrylic splint Herbst or with a cantilever Herbst.
    Silva JF; Gerszewski C; Moresca RC; Correr GM; Flores-Mir C; Moro A
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 24849335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Case report of Fränkel appliance therapy type II and type IV during growth].
    Morita S; Tokuda N; Kohmura T; Takato M; Hara S; Fukamachi H; Hanada K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Jun; 45(2):311-25. PubMed ID: 3462278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.