BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30418529)

  • 1. Subdistribution hazard models for competing risks in discrete time.
    Berger M; Schmid M; Welchowski T; Schmitz-Valckenberg S; Beyersmann J
    Biostatistics; 2020 Jul; 21(3):449-466. PubMed ID: 30418529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A proportional hazards regression model for the subdistribution with right-censored and left-truncated competing risks data.
    Zhang X; Zhang MJ; Fine J
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(16):1933-51. PubMed ID: 21557288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The importance of censoring in competing risks analysis of the subdistribution hazard.
    Donoghoe MW; Gebski V
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28376736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time-dependent covariates in the proportional subdistribution hazards model for competing risks.
    Beyersmann J; Schumacher M
    Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):765-76. PubMed ID: 18434297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the relation between the cause-specific hazard and the subdistribution rate for competing risks data: The Fine-Gray model revisited.
    Putter H; Schumacher M; van Houwelingen HC
    Biom J; 2020 May; 62(3):790-807. PubMed ID: 32128860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of the Absolute Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Other Events: Issues With the Use of Multiple Fine-Gray Subdistribution Hazard Models.
    Austin PC; Putter H; Lee DS; Steyerberg EW
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2022 Feb; 15(2):e008368. PubMed ID: 35098725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proportional subdistribution hazards modeling offers a summary analysis, even if misspecified.
    Grambauer N; Schumacher M; Beyersmann J
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):875-84. PubMed ID: 20213713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Goodness-of-fit test for monotone proportional subdistribution hazards assumptions based on weighted residuals.
    Boher JM; Filleron T; Giorgi R; Kramar A; Cook RJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):362-377. PubMed ID: 27790725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An imputation approach using subdistribution weights for deep survival analysis with competing events.
    Gorgi Zadeh S; Behning C; Schmid M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3815. PubMed ID: 35264661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Additive subdistribution hazards regression for competing risks data in case-cohort studies.
    Wogu AF; Li H; Zhao S; Nichols HB; Cai J
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3010-3022. PubMed ID: 36606409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The number of primary events per variable affects estimation of the subdistribution hazard competing risks model.
    Austin PC; Allignol A; Fine JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():75-84. PubMed ID: 28088594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical recommendations for reporting Fine-Gray model analyses for competing risk data.
    Austin PC; Fine JP
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4391-4400. PubMed ID: 28913837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A full competing risk analysis of hospital-acquired infections can easily be performed by a case-cohort approach.
    Wolkewitz M; Palomar-Martinez M; Olaechea-Astigarraga P; Alvarez-Lerma F; Schumacher M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():187-93. PubMed ID: 26633600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semiparametric accelerated failure time cure rate mixture models with competing risks.
    Choi S; Zhu L; Huang X
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 28983935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Joint modeling of multivariate longitudinal data and the dropout process in a competing risk setting: application to ICU data.
    Deslandes E; Chevret S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jul; 10():69. PubMed ID: 20670425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Penalized variable selection in competing risks regression.
    Fu Z; Parikh CR; Zhou B
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Jul; 23(3):353-376. PubMed ID: 27016934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cause-specific cumulative incidence estimation and the fine and gray model under both left truncation and right censoring.
    Geskus RB
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20377575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regularized Weighted Nonparametric Likelihood Approach for High-Dimension Sparse Subdistribution Hazards Model for Competing Risk Data.
    Tapak L; Kosorok MR; Sadeghifar M; Hamidi O; Afshar S; Doosti H
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2021; 2021():5169052. PubMed ID: 34589136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods of competing risks flexible parametric modeling for estimation of the risk of the first disease among HIV infected men.
    Nouri S; Mahmoudi M; Mohammad K; Mansournia MA; Yaseri M; Akhtar-Danesh N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):17. PubMed ID: 31996148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tree-based models for survival data with competing risks.
    Kretowska M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jun; 159():185-198. PubMed ID: 29650312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.