These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30418635)

  • 1. Early spatial attention deployment toward and away from aggressive voices.
    Burra N; Kerzel D; Munoz Tord D; Grandjean D; Ceravolo L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 14(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 30418635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of spatial selective attention in the processing of affective prosodies in congenitally blind adults: An ERP study.
    Topalidis P; Zinchenko A; Gädeke JC; Föcker J
    Brain Res; 2020 Jul; 1739():146819. PubMed ID: 32251662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proximal vocal threat recruits the right voice-sensitive auditory cortex.
    Ceravolo L; Frühholz S; Grandjean D
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 May; 11(5):793-802. PubMed ID: 26746180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus complexity matters when you hear your own voice: Attention effects on self-generated voice processing.
    Conde T; Gonçalves ÓF; Pinheiro AP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Nov; 133():66-78. PubMed ID: 30114437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control mechanisms mediating shifts of attention in auditory and visual space: a spatio-temporal ERP analysis.
    Green JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McDonald JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):358-69. PubMed ID: 16075294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attending points in time and space.
    Lange K; Krämer UM; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 16506009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural sensitivity to human voices: ERP evidence of task and attentional influences.
    Levy DA; Granot R; Bentin S
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Mar; 40(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 12820870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.
    Conde T; Gonçalves ÓF; Pinheiro AP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 16(1):106-23. PubMed ID: 26415897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulate event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli.
    Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 148(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 12478394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modulation of auditory stimulus processing by visual spatial or temporal cue: an event-related potentials study.
    Tang X; Li C; Li Q; Gao Y; Yang W; Yang J; Ishikawa S; Wu J
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Oct; 553():40-5. PubMed ID: 23896527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Altered auditory-tactile interactions in congenitally blind humans: an event-related potential study.
    Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 159(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 15241575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attention is critical for spatial auditory object formation.
    Zobel BH; Freyman RL; Sanders LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1998-2010. PubMed ID: 25939699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vocal threat enhances visual perception as a function of attention and sex.
    Schirmer A; Wijaya M; Wu E; Penney TB
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 14(7):727-735. PubMed ID: 31216037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulation of auditory spatial attention by visual emotional cues: differential effects of attentional engagement and disengagement for pleasant and unpleasant cues.
    Harrison NR; Woodhouse R
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 26842012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the temporal dynamics of sustained and transient spatial attention using steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Zhang D; Hong B; Gao S; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1575-1591. PubMed ID: 28258437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision, audition, and touch: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(12):1292-303. PubMed ID: 11566312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective influences of cross-modal spatial-cues on preattentive auditory processing: a whole-head magnetoencephalography study.
    Mathiak K; Hertrich I; Zvyagintsev M; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(3):627-34. PubMed ID: 16054843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.