These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30419173)

  • 1. Validity and Responsiveness of the Single Alpha-numeric Evaluation for Shoulder Patients.
    Thigpen CA; Shanley E; Momaya AM; Kissenberth MJ; Tolan SJ; Tokish JM; Hawkins RJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Dec; 46(14):3480-3485. PubMed ID: 30419173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores correlate positively with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores postoperatively in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.
    Retzky JS; Baker M; Hannan CV; Srikumaran U
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):146-149. PubMed ID: 31401127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a reliable metric to measure clinically significant improvements following shoulder arthroplasty.
    Gowd AK; Charles MD; Liu JN; Lalehzarian SP; Cabarcas BC; Manderle BJ; Nicholson GP; Romeo AA; Verma NN
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Nov; 28(11):2238-2246. PubMed ID: 31307894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation be used as a stand-alone subjective outcome instrument in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair?
    Baumgarten KM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2542-2553. PubMed ID: 35750155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) correlates with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Wickman JR; Lau BC; Scribani MB; Wittstein JR
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Feb; 29(2):363-369. PubMed ID: 31542324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of PROMIS Global-10 Compared With Legacy Instruments for Rotator Cuff Disease.
    Nicholson AD; Kassam HF; Pan SD; Berman JE; Blaine TA; Kovacevic D
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Jan; 47(1):181-188. PubMed ID: 30481472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responsiveness and Internal Validity of Common Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
    Sciascia AD; Morris BJ; Jacobs CA; Edwards TB
    Orthopedics; 2017 May; 40(3):e513-e519. PubMed ID: 28358978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimal important clinical difference values are not uniformly valid in the active duty military population recovering from shoulder surgery.
    Sheean AJ; Tenan MS; DeFoor MT; Cognetti DJ; Bedi A; Lin A; Dekker TJ; ; Dickens JF
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Nov; 33(11):e596-e605. PubMed ID: 38614369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability.
    Scanaliato JP; Green CK; Sandler AB; Hurley ET; Hettrich CM; Parnes N
    Am J Sports Med; 2024 Jan; 52(1):207-214. PubMed ID: 38164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How Is Maximum Outcome Improvement Defined in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy for Rotator Cuff Repair? A 1-Year Follow-Up Study.
    Beck EC; Gowd AK; Liu JN; Waterman BR; Nicholson KF; Forsythe B; Yanke AB; Cole BJ; Verma NN
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Jul; 36(7):1805-1810. PubMed ID: 32201303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Establishing clinically significant outcome thresholds for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Cohn MR; Kunze KN; Polce EM; Nemsick M; Garrigues GE; Forsythe B; Nicholson GP; Cole BJ; Verma NN
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):e137-e146. PubMed ID: 32711106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.
    Kim DM; Kim TH; Kholinne E; Park JH; Shin MJ; Kim H; Park D; Jeon IH; Koh KH
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Sep; 48(11):2650-2659. PubMed ID: 32813985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported shoulder outcomes.
    Jones IA; Togashi R; Heckmann N; Vangsness CT
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1484-1492. PubMed ID: 32249146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation Between American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation Score After Rotator Cuff or SLAP Repair.
    Cunningham G; Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Kherad O; Burkhart SS
    Arthroscopy; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1688-92. PubMed ID: 25911388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of age and gender in rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptom state 2 years after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction.
    Ben H; Yeom JW; Kholinne E; Guo J; Park JY; Ryu SM; Koh KH; Jeon IH
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2024 Apr; 32(4):1038-1048. PubMed ID: 38477103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Convergent Validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System's Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test for the Knee and Shoulder Injury Sports Medicine Patient Population.
    Robins RJ; Anderson MB; Zhang Y; Presson AP; Burks RT; Greis PE
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Mar; 33(3):608-616. PubMed ID: 27964968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Correlates with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score for Common Elbow Pathology: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Patel MS; Kirsch JM; Gutman MJ; McEntee RM; Alberta F; Ramsey ML; Abboud JA; Namdari S
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Aug; 49(10):2771-2777. PubMed ID: 34170754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) be used as a stand-alone outcome instrument in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty?
    Baumgarten KM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Sep; 31(9):e426-e435. PubMed ID: 35413432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty?
    Werner BC; Chang B; Nguyen JT; Dines DM; Gulotta LV
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2672-2681. PubMed ID: 27392769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.
    Manderle BJ; Gowd AK; Liu JN; Beletsky A; Nwachukwu BU; Nicholson GP; Bush-Joseph C; Romeo AA; Forsythe B; Cole BJ; Verma NN
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Dec; 48(14):3447-3453. PubMed ID: 33079576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.