469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30419198)
1. Uterine structural abnormality and intrauterine device malposition: analysis of ultrasonographic and demographic variables of 517 patients.
Gerkowicz SA; Fiorentino DG; Kovacs AP; Arheart KL; Verma U
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):183.e1-183.e8. PubMed ID: 30419198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uterine dimensions and intrauterine device malposition: can ultrasound predict displacement or expulsion before it happens?
Çintesun FNİ; Çintesun E; Esenkaya Ü; Günenc O
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Nov; 302(5):1181-1187. PubMed ID: 32748051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of Intrauterine Device Malposition With Previous Cesarean Delivery and Related Uterine Anatomical Changes.
Doulaveris G; Jou J; Leung WK; Bircaj E; Orfanelli T; Atrio J; Dar P; Rotenberg O
J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Jun; 43(6):1121-1129. PubMed ID: 38421056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery.
Gurney EP; Sonalkar S; McAllister A; Sammel MD; Schreiber CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):183.e1-183.e9. PubMed ID: 29870737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence and Risk Factors for a Malpositioned Intrauterine Device Detected on Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Within Eight Weeks of Placement.
Connolly CT; Fox NS
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jun; 41(6):1525-1536. PubMed ID: 34580900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrauterine device use among women with uterine fibroids: a systematic review.
Zapata LB; Whiteman MK; Tepper NK; Jamieson DJ; Marchbanks PA; Curtis KM
Contraception; 2010 Jul; 82(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 20682142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT imaging of intrauterine devices (IUD): expected findings, unexpected findings, and complications.
Zhu GG; Ludwig DR; Rogers DM; Olpin JD; Barker E; Freeman EA; Eisenberg DL; Siegel CL
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Jan; 49(1):237-248. PubMed ID: 37907685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies.
Braaten KP; Benson CB; Maurer R; Goldberg AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 118(5):1014-1020. PubMed ID: 22015868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ESHRE/ESGE female genital tract anomalies classification system-the potential impact of discarding arcuate uterus on clinical practice.
Knez J; Saridogan E; Van Den Bosch T; Mavrelos D; Ambler G; Jurkovic D
Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):600-606. PubMed ID: 29514262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design of the Association of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study: a multisite retrospective cohort study.
Anthony MS; Reed SD; Armstrong MA; Getahun D; Gatz JL; Saltus CW; Zhou X; Schoendorf J; Postlethwaite DA; Raine-Bennett T; Fassett MJ; Peipert JF; Ritchey ME; Ichikawa LE; Lynen R; Alabaster AL; Merchant M; Chiu VY; Shi JM; Xie F; Hui SL; Wang J; Hunter S; Bartsch J; Frenz AK; Chillemi G; Im TM; Takhar HS; Asiimwe A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):599.e1-599.e18. PubMed ID: 33460585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional ultrasound detection of abnormally located intrauterine contraceptive devices which are a source of pelvic pain and abnormal bleeding.
Benacerraf BR; Shipp TD; Bromley B
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 19565532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the type of intrauterine device affect conspicuity on 2D and 3D ultrasound?
Moschos E; Twickler DM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1439-43. PubMed ID: 21606311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonography of intrauterine devices.
Nowitzki KM; Hoimes ML; Chen B; Zheng LZ; Kim YH
Ultrasonography; 2015 Jul; 34(3):183-94. PubMed ID: 25985959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of intrauterine infectious complications after uterine artery embolization.
Rajan DK; Beecroft JR; Clark TW; Asch MR; Simons ME; Kachura JR; Sved M; Sniderman KW
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Dec; 15(12):1415-21. PubMed ID: 15590799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a handheld point of care ultrasonography to assess IUD position compared to conventional transvaginal ultrasonography.
Araujo KG; Yoshida A; Juliato CRT; Sarian LO; Derchain S
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2024 Apr; 29(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 38651645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ease of removal of malpositioned intrauterine devices: A retrospective cohort study.
Frisse AC; Louik JB; Kachwala IA; Wu H; Felix N; Vorawandthanachai T; Avila K; Benfield NC
Contraception; 2024 Jun; ():110504. PubMed ID: 38848813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uterine fibroids: Correlations of anemia and pain to fibroid location and uterine weight.
Bachmann GA; Bahouth LA; Amalraj P; Mhamunkar V; Hoes K; Ananth CV
J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(11-12):463-6. PubMed ID: 22195327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The management of uterine fibroids in women with otherwise unexplained infertility.
Carranza-Mamane B; Havelock J; Hemmings R; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Mar; 37(3):277-285. PubMed ID: 26001875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors for Discontinuation of Intrauterine Devices That Underwent Ultrasound-Guided Placement in a Long-term Follow-up Cohort.
Balica A; Dickson KM; Egan S; Cabrera J
J Ultrasound Med; 2021 Oct; 40(10):2115-2122. PubMed ID: 33301197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
