BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

793 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30419290)

  • 1. Iliac screws may not be necessary in long-segment constructs with L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion: cadaveric study of stability and instrumentation strain.
    Hlubek RJ; Godzik J; Newcomb AGUS; Lehrman JN; de Andrada B; Bohl MA; Farber SH; Kelly BP; Turner JD
    Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):942-950. PubMed ID: 30419290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supplemental rods are needed to maximally reduce rod strain across the lumbosacral junction with TLIF but not ALIF in long constructs.
    Godzik J; Hlubek RJ; Newcomb AGUS; Lehrman JN; de Andrada Pereira B; Farber SH; Lenke LG; Kelly BP; Turner JD
    Spine J; 2019 Jun; 19(6):1121-1131. PubMed ID: 30684758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.
    Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical analysis of sacral screw strain and range of motion in long posterior spinal fixation constructs: effects of lumbosacral fixation strategies in reducing sacral screw strains.
    Fleischer GD; Kim YJ; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Boachie-Adjei O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):E163-9. PubMed ID: 21857409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanics of a laterally placed sacroiliac joint fusion device supplemental to S2 alar-iliac fixation in a long-segment adult spinal deformity construct: a cadaveric study of stability and strain distribution.
    de Andrada Pereira B; Wangsawatwong P; Lehrman JN; Sawa AGU; Lindsey DP; Yerby SA; Godzik J; Waguespack AM; Uribe JS; Kelly BP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Jan; 36(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 34534964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws.
    Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
    Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.
    Cannestra AF; Peterson MD; Parker SR; Roush TF; Bundy JV; Turner AW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S44-9. PubMed ID: 26825792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
    Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjacent-segment effects of lumbar cortical screw-rod fixation versus pedicle screw-rod fixation with and without interbody support.
    Wangsawatwong P; Sawa AGU; de Andrada Pereira B; Lehrman JN; O'Neill LK; Turner JD; Uribe JS; Kelly BP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jun; 35(3):263-269. PubMed ID: 34144524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbosacral reconstruction techniques for spondylolisthesis: an in vitro porcine model.
    Cunningham BW; Lewis SJ; Long J; Dmitriev AE; Linville DA; Bridwell KH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(21):2321-7. PubMed ID: 12438979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Range of motion, sacral screw and rod strain in long posterior spinal constructs: a biomechanical comparison between S2 alar iliac screws with traditional fixation strategies.
    Sutterlin CE; Field A; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Phan K
    J Spine Surg; 2016 Dec; 2(4):266-276. PubMed ID: 28097243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. S1 screw bending moment with posterior spinal instrumentation across the lumbosacral junction after unilateral iliac crest harvest.
    Alegre GM; Gupta MC; Bay BK; Smith TS; Laubach JE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(18):1950-5. PubMed ID: 11547192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and axial interbody threaded rod on range of motion and S1 screw loading in a destabilized L5-S1 spondylolisthesis model.
    Fleischer GD; Hart D; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Avidano EE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(2):E82-8. PubMed ID: 24150429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques.
    Niemeyer TK; Koriller M; Claes L; Kettler A; Werner K; Wilke HJ
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite Element Analysis of a New Pedicle Screw-Plate System for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Li J; Shang J; Zhou Y; Li C; Liu H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144637. PubMed ID: 26649749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.