These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30419827)

  • 1. Hypothesis testing in Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Uhlmann L; Jensen K; Kieser M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):128. PubMed ID: 30419827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data.
    Seide SE; Jensen K; Kieser M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):363-378. PubMed ID: 31955519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using structural equation modeling for network meta-analysis.
    Tu YK; Wu YC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):104. PubMed ID: 28709406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31018836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Law M; Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 27465416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of anti-malarial drugs efficacy in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in African children and adults using network meta-analysis.
    Whegang Youdom S; Tahar R; Basco LK
    Malar J; 2017 Aug; 16(1):311. PubMed ID: 28774303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian splines versus fractional polynomials in network meta-analysis.
    Heinecke A; Tallarita M; De Iorio M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):261. PubMed ID: 33081698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.
    Menten J; Lesaffre E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():70. PubMed ID: 26315894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative review of network meta-analysis models in longitudinal randomized controlled trial.
    Tallarita M; De Iorio M; Baio G
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(16):3053-3072. PubMed ID: 31050822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpreting and assessing confidence in network meta-analysis results: an introduction for clinicians.
    Yang A; Pechlivanoglou P; Aoyama K
    J Anesth; 2022 Aug; 36(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 35641661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
    Odani M; Fukimbara S; Sato T
    Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 28059578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation study to compare different estimation approaches for network meta-analysis and corresponding methods to evaluate the consistency assumption.
    Kiefer C; Sturtz S; Bender R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 32093605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causal inference and adjustment for reference-arm risk in indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis.
    Swallow E; Patterson-Lomba O; Ayyagari R; Pelletier C; Mehta R; Signorovitch J
    J Comp Eff Res; 2020 Jul; 9(10):737-750. PubMed ID: 32490682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jul; 15():58. PubMed ID: 26227148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective.
    Kruschke JK; Liddell TM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):178-206. PubMed ID: 28176294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the impact of a matching-adjusted indirect comparison in a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Leahy J; Walsh C
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):546-568. PubMed ID: 31368653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: avoiding spurious judgments of imprecision in sparse networks.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Murad MH; Walter SD; McLeod S; Carrasco-Labra A; Rochwerg B; Schünemann HJ; Tomlinson G; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():60-67. PubMed ID: 30253217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.
    Lin L; Xing A; Kofler MJ; Murad MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():41-49. PubMed ID: 30342086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multilevel approach to network meta-analysis within a frequentist framework.
    Greco T; Edefonti V; Biondi-Zoccai G; Decarli A; Gasparini M; Zangrillo A; Landoni G
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 May; 42():51-9. PubMed ID: 25804722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating network meta-analysis and inconsistency using arm-parameterized model in structural equation modeling.
    Shih MC; Tu YK
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):240-254. PubMed ID: 30834677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.