BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30419998)

  • 1. Factors affecting Observers' Accuracy when Assessing Credibility: The Effect of the Interaction between Media, Senders' Competence and Veracity.
    Caso L; Maricchiolo F; Livi S; Vrij A; Palena N
    Span J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 21():E49. PubMed ID: 30419998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motivational cues: the role of perceived senders' self-control ability in raters' deception judgements.
    Wu S; Zou H; Cai W; Wang X; Jin S
    Int J Psychol; 2014 Apr; 49(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 24811883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Registered report: measuring unconscious deception detection by skin temperature.
    van ' T Veer AE; Stel M; van Beest I; Gallucci M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():442. PubMed ID: 24904461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observers' performance at evaluating truthfulness when provided with comparable truth or small talk baselines.
    Caso L; Palena N; Vrij A; Gnisci A
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(4):571-579. PubMed ID: 31984097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is It the Judge, the Sender, or Just the Individual Message? Disentangling Person and Message Effects on Variation in Lie-Detection Judgments.
    Volz S; Reinhard MA; Müller P
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Nov; 18(6):1368-1387. PubMed ID: 36791692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deception detection: interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements.
    Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 135(6):603-20. PubMed ID: 11931002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceived truth of statements and simulated social media postings: an experimental investigation of source credibility, repeated exposure, and presentation format.
    Nadarevic L; Reber R; Helmecke AJ; Köse D
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Nov; 5(1):56. PubMed ID: 33175284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unconscious deception detection measured by finger skin temperature and indirect veracity judgments-results of a registered report.
    van 't Veer AE; Gallucci M; Stel M; van Beest I
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():672. PubMed ID: 26106339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The perception of visible speech: estimation of speech rate and detection of time reversals.
    Viviani P; Figliozzi F; Lacquaniti F
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(2):141-61. PubMed ID: 21986668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aging and the visual perception of exocentric distance.
    Norman JF; Adkins OC; Norman HF; Cox AG; Rogers CE
    Vision Res; 2015 Apr; 109(Pt A):52-8. PubMed ID: 25720533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experienced and novice officers' generalized communication suspicion and veracity judgments.
    Masip J; Alonso H; Herrero C; Garrido E
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Apr; 40(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 26844912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.
    Law MKH; Jackson SA; Aidman E; Geiger M; Olderbak S; Kleitman S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196384. PubMed ID: 29723243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deception and deception detection: the role of cross-modal inconsistency.
    Heinrich CU; Borkenau P
    J Pers; 1998 Oct; 66(5):687-712. PubMed ID: 9802230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. You must be lying because I don't understand you: Language proficiency and lie detection.
    Elliott E; Leach AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Dec; 22(4):488-499. PubMed ID: 27936858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining police officers' response bias in judging veracity.
    Masip J; Herrero C
    Psicothema; 2017 Nov; 29(4):490-495. PubMed ID: 29048308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The truth about lying.
    Turri A; Turri J
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():161-8. PubMed ID: 25754242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Liar, liar, working memory on fire: Investigating the role of working memory in childhood verbal deception.
    Alloway TP; McCallum F; Alloway RG; Hoicka E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Sep; 137():30-8. PubMed ID: 25913892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.