These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30420170)

  • 1. Similar 24-Hour Dietary Recall Results from Low-Income Women When Collected by a Paraprofessional Nutrition Educator or Registered Dietitian Nutritionist.
    Gills SMH; Auld G; Hess A; Baker SS
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2019 Mar; 119(3):500-506. PubMed ID: 30420170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conducting 24-Hour Dietary Recalls in Group Settings with Adults Having Low-Income: Perspectives of EFNEP Peer Educators.
    Franck K; Puglisi M; Roe AJ; Baker S; Henson T; Earnesty D; Sankavaram K
    Nutrients; 2023 Sep; 15(18):. PubMed ID: 37764803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 24-Hour Dietary Recall in the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program: Perspective of the Program Coordinator.
    Roe AJ; Sankavaram K; Baker S; Franck K; Puglisi M; Earnesty D; Henson T
    Nutrients; 2023 Sep; 15(19):. PubMed ID: 37836431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collection Methods for the 24-Hour Dietary Recall as Used in the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program.
    Gills SM; Baker SS; Auld G
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2017 Mar; 49(3):250-256.e1. PubMed ID: 27876323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall for Children, 2012 Version, for Youth Aged 9 to 11 Years: A Validation Study.
    Diep CS; Hingle M; Chen TA; Dadabhoy HR; Beltran A; Baranowski J; Subar AF; Baranowski T
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2015 Oct; 115(10):1591-8. PubMed ID: 25887784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Portion Sizes from 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Differed by Sex among Those Who Selected the Same Portion Size Category on a Food Frequency Questionnaire.
    Kang M; Park SY; Boushey CJ; Wilkens LR; Monroe KR; Le Marchand L; Kolonel LN; Murphy SP; Paik HY
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Sep; 118(9):1711-1718. PubMed ID: 29752189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Reported Dietary Supplement Intakes between Two 24-Hour Recall Methods: The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool and the Interview-Administered Automated Multiple Pass Method.
    Pannucci TE; Thompson FE; Bailey RL; Dodd KW; Potischman N; Kirkpatrick SI; Alexander GL; Coleman LA; Kushi LH; Groesbeck M; Sundaram M; Clancy H; George SM; Kahle L; Subar AF
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Jun; 118(6):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 29803270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of 24-Hour Dietary Recalls as a Measure of Diet in African-American Youth.
    St George SM; Van Horn ML; Lawman HG; Wilson DK
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2016 Oct; 116(10):1551-1559. PubMed ID: 27394936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Healthy Eating Index-2015 Scores Among Adults Based on Observed vs Recalled Dietary Intake.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Dodd KW; Potischman N; Zimmerman TP; Douglass D; Guenther PM; Durward C; Atoloye AT; Kahle LL; Subar AF; Reedy J
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2021 Nov; 121(11):2233-2241.e1. PubMed ID: 34366116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of the design and validation of web- and computer-based 24-h dietary recall tools.
    Timon CM; van den Barg R; Blain RJ; Kehoe L; Evans K; Walton J; Flynn A; Gibney ER
    Nutr Res Rev; 2016 Dec; 29(2):268-280. PubMed ID: 27955721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Semi-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire Validated in Hispanic Infants and Toddlers Aged 0 to 24 Months.
    Palacios C; Rivas-Tumanyan S; Santiago-Rodríguez EJ; Sinigaglia O; Ríos EM; Campos M; Diaz B; Willett W
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2017 Apr; 117(4):526-535.e9. PubMed ID: 28188114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved Access to and Impact of Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Services Associated with an Integrated Care Model in a High-Risk, Minority Population.
    Warner MF; Miklos KE; Strowman SR; Ireland K; Pojednic RM
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Oct; 118(10):1951-1957. PubMed ID: 30029962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative validation of a bilingual interactive multimedia dietary assessment tool.
    Zoellner J; Anderson J; Gould SM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Aug; 105(8):1206-14. PubMed ID: 16182635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Literacy and body fatness are associated with underreporting of energy intake in US low-income women using the multiple-pass 24-hour recall: a doubly labeled water study.
    Johnson RK; Soultanakis RP; Matthews DE
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1998 Oct; 98(10):1136-40. PubMed ID: 9787719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of diet measures from a food-frequency questionnaire with measures from repeated 24-hour dietary recalls. The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.
    Hjartåker A; Andersen LF; Lund E
    Public Health Nutr; 2007 Oct; 10(10):1094-103. PubMed ID: 17381903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The feasibility of personal digital assistants (PDAs) to collect dietary intake data in low-income pregnant women.
    Fowles ER; Gentry B
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2008; 40(6):374-7. PubMed ID: 18984494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of electronic diet recording nutrient estimates compared to dietitian analysis of diet records: randomized controlled trial.
    Raatz SK; Scheett AJ; Johnson LK; Jahns L
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):e21. PubMed ID: 25604640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women.
    Savard C; Lemieux S; Lafrenière J; Laramée C; Robitaille J; Morisset AS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Apr; 18(1):112. PubMed ID: 29685127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Use of Digital Images in 24-Hour Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Douglass D; Zimmerman TP; Kahle LL; Thompson FE; George SM; Subar AF
    J Nutr; 2016 Dec; 146(12):2567-2573. PubMed ID: 27807039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-Meal Nutrient Assessment by a Self-Administered, Electronic Exit Survey Compared with a Multipass Dietary Interview in University Undergraduates in an All-You-Care-to-Eat Campus Dining Hall.
    Slavin M; Polasky A; Vieyra K; Best A; Durant L; Frankenfeld C
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2019 May; 119(5):739-749. PubMed ID: 31029234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.