188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30420198)
1. Methods to monitor accurate and consistent electrode placements in conventional transcranial electrical stimulation.
Indahlastari A; Albizu A; Nissim NR; Traeger KR; O'Shea A; Woods AJ
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 30420198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel technique for accurate electrode placement over cortical targets for transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) clinical trials.
Jog M; Anderson C; Kim E; Garrett A; Kubicki A; Gonzalez S; Jann K; Iacoboni M; Woods R; Wang DJ; Narr KL
J Neural Eng; 2021 Oct; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 34555822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Woods AJ; Bryant V; Sacchetti D; Gervits F; Hamilton R
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 25583653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are we really targeting and stimulating DLPFC by placing transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) electrodes over F3/F4?
Soleimani G; Kuplicki R; Camchong J; Opitz A; Paulus MP; Lim KO; Ekhtiari H
Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Dec; 44(17):6275-6287. PubMed ID: 37750607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the importance of precise electrode placement for targeted transcranial electric stimulation.
Opitz A; Yeagle E; Thielscher A; Schroeder C; Mehta AD; Milham MP
Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():560-567. PubMed ID: 30010008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How structural and functional MRI can inform dual-site tACS parameters: A case study in a clinical population and its pragmatic implications.
Soleimani G; Kupliki R; Bodurka J; Paulus MP; Ekhtiari H
Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(2):337-351. PubMed ID: 35042056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Movement Along the Spine Induced by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Related Electrode Positioning.
Hoebink EA; Journée HL; de Kleuver M; Berends H; Racz I; van Hal C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jul; 41(14):1128-1132. PubMed ID: 26890949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling transcranial electrical stimulation in the aging brain.
Indahlastari A; Albizu A; O'Shea A; Forbes MA; Nissim NR; Kraft JN; Evangelista ND; Hausman HK; Woods AJ;
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(3):664-674. PubMed ID: 32289695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models.
Cancelli A; Cottone C; Tecchio F; Truong DQ; Dmochowski J; Bikson M
J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036022. PubMed ID: 27172063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potentials Monitoring with Direct Cranial Stimulation by Peg-Screw and Transcranial Stimulation by Corkscrew for Supratentorial Surgery.
Kanaya K; Goto T; Horiuchi T; Hongo K
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e1044-e1050. PubMed ID: 30980975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter-individual and age-dependent variability in simulated electric fields induced by conventional transcranial electrical stimulation.
Antonenko D; Grittner U; Saturnino G; Nierhaus T; Thielscher A; Flöel A
Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117413. PubMed ID: 33011418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Probing EEG activity in the targeted cortex after focal transcranial electrical stimulation.
Tashiro S; Siebner HR; Charalampaki A; Göksu C; Saturnino GB; Thielscher A; Tomasevic L
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(3):815-818. PubMed ID: 32289712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of transcranial stimulating electrode montages over the head for lower-extremity transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring.
Tomio R; Akiyama T; Ohira T; Yoshida K
J Neurosurg; 2017 Jun; 126(6):1951-1958. PubMed ID: 27662531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Key factors in the cortical response to transcranial electrical Stimulations-A multi-scale modeling study.
Chung H; Im C; Seo H; Jun SC
Comput Biol Med; 2022 May; 144():105328. PubMed ID: 35231800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can transcranial electric stimulation with multiple electrodes reach deep targets?
Huang Y; Parra LC
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 30297323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Borges H; Dufau A; Paneri B; Woods AJ; Knotkova H; Bikson M
J Vis Exp; 2020 Jan; (155):. PubMed ID: 31957745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accessibility of cortical regions to focal TES: Dependence on spatial position, safety, and practical constraints.
Saturnino GB; Siebner HR; Thielscher A; Madsen KH
Neuroimage; 2019 Dec; 203():116183. PubMed ID: 31525498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrical fields induced inside the rat brain with skin, skull, and dural placements of the current injection electrode.
Asan AS; Gok S; Sahin M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0203727. PubMed ID: 30629578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome measures for electric field modeling in tES and TMS: A systematic review and large-scale modeling study.
Van Hoornweder S; Nuyts M; Frieske J; Verstraelen S; Meesen RLJ; Caulfield KA
Neuroimage; 2023 Nov; 281():120379. PubMed ID: 37716590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
