These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30420395)

  • 1. Ethnicity-based fetal growth charts could reduce inductions and elective cesarean sections.
    Glauser W
    CMAJ; 2018 Nov; 190(45):E1343-E1344. PubMed ID: 30420395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.
    Blue NR; Beddow ME; Savabi M; Katukuri VR; Chao CR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 30118689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the effects of age, gestation, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity on labor inductions.
    Wilson BL
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2007; 39(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 17760792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal outcome in emergency versus elective cesarean sections at Souissi Maternity Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
    Benzouina S; Boubkraoui Mel-M; Mrabet M; Chahid N; Kharbach A; El-Hassani A; Barkat A
    Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 23():197. PubMed ID: 27347286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability in birthweight, birthweight charts, and adverse outcomes: Is the "right size" the right question?
    Urquia ML
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 33(6):433-435. PubMed ID: 31670420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Customized growth charts: rationale, validation and clinical benefits.
    Gardosi J; Francis A; Turner S; Williams M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S609-S618. PubMed ID: 29422203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gestational diabetes and fetal growth acceleration: induction of labour versus expectant management.
    Alberico S; Businelli C; Wiesenfeld U; Erenbourg A; Maso G; Piccoli M; Ronfani L
    Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Dec; 62(6):533-9. PubMed ID: 21079575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Labor in pregnancies with small for gestational age suspected fetuses.
    Warzecha D; Kobryń E; Bagińska M; Bomba-Opoń D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1217-1224. PubMed ID: 30024662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theory of obstetrics: an epidemiologic framework for justifying medically indicated early delivery.
    Joseph KS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Mar; 7():4. PubMed ID: 17391525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Elective induction of labor in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: an intervention that modifies the risk of cesarean section.
    Bas-Lando M; Srebnik N; Farkash R; Ioscovich A; Samueloff A; Grisaru-Granovsky S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Nov; 290(5):905-12. PubMed ID: 24973018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question].
    Rozenberg P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May; 46(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 29656952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.
    Wilson BL; Effken J; Butler RJ
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Jun; 42(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 20618597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neonatal and fetal growth charts to identify preterm infants <30 weeks gestation at risk of adverse outcomes.
    Boghossian NS; Geraci M; Edwards EM; Horbar JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):195.e1-195.e14. PubMed ID: 29750954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Severe preeclampsia remote from term: labor induction or elective cesarean delivery?
    Nassar AH; Adra AM; Chakhtoura N; Gómez-Marín O; Beydoun S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 179(5):1210-3. PubMed ID: 9822502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Birth-weight charts and immigrant populations: A critical review.
    Urquia ML; Sørbye IK; Wanigaratne S
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Apr; 32():69-76. PubMed ID: 26453476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Infants of diabetic mothers with abnormal fetal growth missed by standard growth charts.
    Narchi H; Skinner A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 29(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 19757264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of fetal growth by customized growth charts.
    Gaillard R; Jaddoe VW
    Ann Nutr Metab; 2014; 65(2-3):149-55. PubMed ID: 25413653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The INTERGROWTH-21
    Papageorghiou AT; Kennedy SH; Salomon LJ; Altman DG; Ohuma EO; Stones W; Gravett MG; Barros FC; Victora C; Purwar M; Jaffer Y; Noble JA; Bertino E; Pang R; Cheikh Ismail L; Lambert A; Bhutta ZA; Villar J;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S630-S640. PubMed ID: 29422205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Labour in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
    Grabowska K; Stapińska-Syniec A; Saletra A; Jarmużek P; Bomba-Opoń D
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 28326517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ELECTIVE INDUCTION OF LABOR.
    GLYNN MZ; MURRAY RR; ESPOSITO J; RUBINO G; ZAROU DM
    N Y State J Med; 1965 Apr; 65():991-4. PubMed ID: 14267446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.