200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30420739)
1. Comparison of linear frequency and amplitude modulation for intraneural sensory feedback in bidirectional hand prostheses.
Valle G; Petrini FM; Strauss I; Iberite F; D'Anna E; Granata G; Controzzi M; Cipriani C; Stieglitz T; Rossini PM; Mazzoni A; Raspopovic S; Micera S
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16666. PubMed ID: 30420739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity to temporal parameters of intraneural tactile sensory feedback.
Valle G; Strauss I; D'Anna E; Granata G; Di Iorio R; Stieglitz T; Rossini PM; Raspopovic S; Petrini FM; Micera S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 17(1):110. PubMed ID: 32799900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrotactile Feedback Improves Grip Force Control and Enables Object Stiffness Recognition While Using a Myoelectric Hand.
Chai G; Wang H; Li G; Sheng X; Zhu X
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():1310-1320. PubMed ID: 35533165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomimetic Intraneural Sensory Feedback Enhances Sensation Naturalness, Tactile Sensitivity, and Manual Dexterity in a Bidirectional Prosthesis.
Valle G; Mazzoni A; Iberite F; D'Anna E; Strauss I; Granata G; Controzzi M; Clemente F; Rognini G; Cipriani C; Stieglitz T; Petrini FM; Rossini PM; Micera S
Neuron; 2018 Oct; 100(1):37-45.e7. PubMed ID: 30244887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraneural sensory feedback restores grip force control and motor coordination while using a prosthetic hand.
Clemente F; Valle G; Controzzi M; Strauss I; Iberite F; Stieglitz T; Granata G; Rossini PM; Petrini F; Micera S; Cipriani C
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026034. PubMed ID: 30736030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis.
Dosen S; Markovic M; Somer K; Graimann B; Farina D
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():55. PubMed ID: 26088323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrotactile EMG feedback improves the control of prosthesis grasping force.
Schweisfurth MA; Markovic M; Dosen S; Teich F; Graimann B; Farina D
J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056010. PubMed ID: 27547992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand.
Pena AE; Rincon-Gonzalez L; Abbas JJ; Jung R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210956. PubMed ID: 30650161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and technical construction of a tactile display for sensory feedback in a hand prosthesis system.
Antfolk C; Balkenius C; Lundborg G; Rosén B; Sebelius F
Biomed Eng Online; 2010 Sep; 9():50. PubMed ID: 20840758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Six-Month Assessment of a Hand Prosthesis with Intraneural Tactile Feedback.
Petrini FM; Valle G; Strauss I; Granata G; Di Iorio R; D'Anna E; Čvančara P; Mueller M; Carpaneto J; Clemente F; Controzzi M; Bisoni L; Carboni C; Barbaro M; Iodice F; Andreu D; Hiairrassary A; Divoux JL; Cipriani C; Guiraud D; Raffo L; Fernandez E; Stieglitz T; Raspopovic S; Rossini PM; Micera S
Ann Neurol; 2019 Jan; 85(1):137-154. PubMed ID: 30474259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses.
Raspopovic S; Capogrosso M; Petrini FM; Bonizzato M; Rigosa J; Di Pino G; Carpaneto J; Controzzi M; Boretius T; Fernandez E; Granata G; Oddo CM; Citi L; Ciancio AL; Cipriani C; Carrozza MC; Jensen W; Guglielmelli E; Stieglitz T; Rossini PM; Micera S
Sci Transl Med; 2014 Feb; 6(222):222ra19. PubMed ID: 24500407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Myocontrol is closed-loop control: incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping.
Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(1):81. PubMed ID: 30176929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discriminability of multiple cutaneous and proprioceptive hand percepts evoked by intraneural stimulation with Utah slanted electrode arrays in human amputees.
Page DM; George JA; Wendelken SM; Davis TS; Kluger DT; Hutchinson DT; Clark GA
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 33478534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis.
Thomas N; Ung G; McGarvey C; Brown JD
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 16(1):70. PubMed ID: 31186005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensory feedback for limb prostheses in amputees.
Raspopovic S; Valle G; Petrini FM
Nat Mater; 2021 Jul; 20(7):925-939. PubMed ID: 33859381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensory restoration by epidural stimulation of the lateral spinal cord in upper-limb amputees.
Chandrasekaran S; Nanivadekar AC; McKernan G; Helm ER; Boninger ML; Collinger JL; Gaunt RA; Fisher LE
Elife; 2020 Jul; 9():. PubMed ID: 32691733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electro-cutaneous stimulation on the palm elicits referred sensations on intact but not on amputated digits.
D' Alonzo M; Engels LF; Controzzi M; Cipriani C
J Neural Eng; 2018 Feb; 15(1):016003. PubMed ID: 28741593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Case Studies in Neuroscience: Sensations elicited and discrimination ability from nerve cuff stimulation in an amputee over time.
Ackerley R; Backlund Wasling H; Ortiz-Catalan M; Brånemark R; Wessberg J
J Neurophysiol; 2018 Jul; 120(1):291-295. PubMed ID: 29742031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychometric characterization of incidental feedback sources during grasping with a hand prosthesis.
Wilke MA; Niethammer C; Meyer B; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 16(1):155. PubMed ID: 31823792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
