126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30421287)
1. [Time trend in programme sensitivity within the German mammography screening programme in North Rhine-Westphalia and Lower Saxony].
Bokhof B; Khil L; Urbschat I; Gnas L; Hecht G; Heidinger O; Heindel W; Kieschke J; Weigel S; Hense HW
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2018 Dec; 61(12):1517-1527. PubMed ID: 30421287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Determination of interval cancer rates in the German mammography screening program using population-based cancer registry data].
Urbschat I; Heidinger O
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Jan; 57(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24357175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of the impact of the mammography screening program on breast cancer mortality: feasibility study on linking several data sources in North Rhine-Westphalia].
Fuhs A; Bartholomäus S; Heidinger O; Hense HW
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Jan; 57(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 24357174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia.
Heidinger O; Batzler WU; Krieg V; Weigel S; Biesheuvel C; Heindel W; Hense HW
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2012 Nov; 109(46):781-7. PubMed ID: 23264826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection and interval cancer rates during the transition from screen-film to digital mammography in population-based screening.
Sankatsing VDV; Fracheboud J; de Munck L; Broeders MJM; van Ravesteyn NT; Heijnsdijk EAM; Verbeek ALM; Otten JDM; Pijnappel RM; Siesling S; de Koning HJ;
BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):256. PubMed ID: 29506487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital mammography screening in Germany: Impact of age and histological subtype on program sensitivity.
Heidinger O; Heidrich J; Batzler WU; Krieg V; Weigel S; Heindel W; Hense HW
Breast; 2015 Jun; 24(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 25687106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isolating the effect of confounding from the observed survival benefit of screening participants - a methodological approach illustrated by data from the German mammography screening programme.
Buschmann L; Wellmann I; Bonberg N; Wellmann J; Hense HW; Karch A; Minnerup H
BMC Med; 2024 Jan; 22(1):43. PubMed ID: 38287392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. German mammography screening program: program sensitivity between 2010 and 2016 estimated based on German health claims data.
Heinze F; Czwikla J; Heinig M; Langner I; Haug U
BMC Cancer; 2023 Sep; 23(1):852. PubMed ID: 37697304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution of the National Breast Screening Programme in Ireland: Two-year interval analysis (2004-2013) of BreastCheck.
Fitzpatrick PE; Greehy G; Mooney MT; Flanagan F; Larke A; Connors A; O'Doherty A
J Med Screen; 2018 Dec; 25(4):191-196. PubMed ID: 29153014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer incidence and mammography screening among resettlers in Germany.
Kaucher S; Khil L; Kajüter H; Becher H; Reder M; Kolip P; Spallek J; Winkler V; Berens EM
BMC Public Health; 2020 Mar; 20(1):417. PubMed ID: 32228537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The North Rhine-Westphalia state programme "Education and Health NRW"-sustainable development and establishment of the good healthy school in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia].
Opitz M
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2022 Jul; 65(7-8):836-843. PubMed ID: 35695898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.
Lee EH; Kim KW; Kim YJ; Shin DR; Park YM; Lim HS; Park JS; Kim HW; Kim YM; Kim HJ; Jun JK
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 27390540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in Breast Cancer Characteristics by Mammography Screening Participation or Non-Participation.
Braun B; Khil L; Tio J; Krause-Bergmann B; Fuhs A; Heidinger O; Hense HW
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2018 Aug; 115(31-32):520-527. PubMed ID: 30149831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol.
Berens EM; Reder M; Kolip P; Spallek J
BMJ Open; 2014 Sep; 4(9):e006145. PubMed ID: 25231495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
