These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30421331)

  • 1. Re-using questions in classroom-based assessment: An exploratory study at the undergraduate medical education level.
    Joncas SX; St-Onge C; Bourque S; Farand P
    Perspect Med Educ; 2018 Dec; 7(6):373-378. PubMed ID: 30421331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sound Practices: An Exploratory Study of Building and Monitoring Multiple-Choice Exams at Canadian Undergraduate Medical Education Programs.
    St-Onge C; Young M; Renaud JS; Cummings BA; Drescher O; Varpio L
    Acad Med; 2021 Feb; 96(2):271-277. PubMed ID: 32769474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric properties of the dundee ready educational environment measure in a sample of Ghanaian Medical Students.
    Mogre V; Amalba A
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2016; 29(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 26996794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review improves psychometric characteristics of multiple choice questions.
    Abozaid H; Park YS; Tekian A
    Med Teach; 2017 Apr; 39(sup1):S50-S54. PubMed ID: 28103718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions at the Department of Paediatrics, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
    Kheyami D; Jaradat A; Al-Shibani T; Ali FA
    Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2018 Feb; 18(1):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 29666684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
    Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimum accepted competency examination: test item analysis.
    McCrossan P; Nicholson A; McCallion N
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):400. PubMed ID: 35614439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A psychometric evaluation of the anatomy learning experiences questionnaire and correlations with learning outcomes.
    Choi-Lundberg DL; Williams AM; Zimitat C
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):514-527. PubMed ID: 28423232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
    Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of extended matching questions examination in undergraduate medical education.
    Bhakta B; Tennant A; Horton M; Lawton G; Andrich D
    BMC Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 5(1):9. PubMed ID: 15752421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Case-based learning and multiple choice questioning methods favored by students.
    Chéron M; Ademi M; Kraft F; Löffler-Stastka H
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():41. PubMed ID: 26830675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New virtual case-based assessment method for decision making in undergraduate students: a scale development and validation.
    Klemenc-Ketis Z; Kersnik J
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Dec; 13():160. PubMed ID: 24295091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-menu questions in computer-based assessments: a retrospective observational study.
    Cerutti B; Blondon K; Galetto A
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():55. PubMed ID: 26861755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.
    Walsh JL; Harris BHL; Denny P; Smith P
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Feb; 94(1108):97-103. PubMed ID: 28866607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing and evaluating the student assessment system in the preclinical problem-based curriculum at Sherbrooke.
    Des Marchais JE; Vu NV
    Acad Med; 1996 Mar; 71(3):274-83. PubMed ID: 8607928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of psychometric properties of the modified SETQ tool in undergraduate medical education.
    Al Ansari A; Strachan K; Hashim S; Otoom S
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 17(1):56. PubMed ID: 28302151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
    Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the effectiveness of progressive disclosure questions as an assessment tool for knowledge and skills in a problem based learning setting among third year medical students at The University of The West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago.
    Vuma S; Sa B
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Nov; 8():673. PubMed ID: 26567129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement practices: methods for developing content-valid student examinations.
    Bridge PD; Musial J; Frank R; Roe T; Sawilowsky S
    Med Teach; 2003 Jul; 25(4):414-21. PubMed ID: 12893554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The foundations of measurement and assessment in medical education.
    Tavakol M; Dennick R
    Med Teach; 2017 Oct; 39(10):1010-1015. PubMed ID: 28768456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.