BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30421408)

  • 1. Spatial Analysis of Functional Enrichment (SAFE) in Large Biological Networks.
    Baryshnikova A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1819():249-268. PubMed ID: 30421408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic Functional Annotation and Visualization of Biological Networks.
    Baryshnikova A
    Cell Syst; 2016 Jun; 2(6):412-21. PubMed ID: 27237738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modular biological function is most effectively captured by combining molecular interaction data types.
    Ames RM; Macpherson JI; Pinney JW; Lovell SC; Robertson DL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e62670. PubMed ID: 23658761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic identification and correction of annotation errors in the genetic interaction map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Atias N; Kupiec M; Sharan R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Mar; 44(5):e50. PubMed ID: 26602688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disentangling the multigenic and pleiotropic nature of molecular function.
    Stoney RA; Ames RM; Nenadic G; Robertson DL; Schwartz JM
    BMC Syst Biol; 2015; 9 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S3. PubMed ID: 26678917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integration of molecular network data reconstructs Gene Ontology.
    Gligorijević V; Janjić V; Pržulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(17):i594-600. PubMed ID: 25161252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting bioprocess targets of chemical compounds through integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interactions.
    Simpkins SW; Nelson J; Deshpande R; Li SC; Piotrowski JS; Wilson EH; Gebre AA; Safizadeh H; Okamoto R; Yoshimura M; Costanzo M; Yashiroda Y; Ohya Y; Osada H; Yoshida M; Boone C; Myers CL
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Oct; 14(10):e1006532. PubMed ID: 30376562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NOA: a novel Network Ontology Analysis method.
    Wang J; Huang Q; Liu ZP; Wang Y; Wu LY; Chen L; Zhang XS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Jul; 39(13):e87. PubMed ID: 21543451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MOSAIC: a chemical-genetic interaction data repository and web resource for exploring chemical modes of action.
    Nelson J; Simpkins SW; Safizadeh H; Li SC; Piotrowski JS; Hirano H; Yashiroda Y; Osada H; Yoshida M; Boone C; Myers CL
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Apr; 34(7):1251-1252. PubMed ID: 29206899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring semantic similarities by combining gene ontology annotations and gene co-function networks.
    Peng J; Uygun S; Kim T; Wang Y; Rhee SY; Chen J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16():44. PubMed ID: 25886899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploratory Analysis of Biological Networks through Visualization, Clustering, and Functional Annotation in Cytoscape.
    Baryshnikova A
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2016 Jun; 2016(6):. PubMed ID: 26988373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. OAHG: an integrated resource for annotating human genes with multi-level ontologies.
    Cheng L; Sun J; Xu W; Dong L; Hu Y; Zhou M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():34820. PubMed ID: 27703231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Large-scale gene co-expression network as a source of functional annotation for cattle genes.
    Beiki H; Nejati-Javaremi A; Pakdel A; Masoudi-Nejad A; Hu ZL; Reecy JM
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):846. PubMed ID: 27806696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying term relations cross different gene ontology categories.
    Peng J; Wang H; Lu J; Hui W; Wang Y; Shang X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 16):573. PubMed ID: 29297309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An integrative approach to inferring biologically meaningful gene modules.
    Cho JH; Wang K; Galas DJ
    BMC Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 5():117. PubMed ID: 21791051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robustness and adaptation reveal plausible cell cycle controlling subnetwork in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Huang JY; Huang CW; Kao KC; Lai PY
    Gene; 2013 Apr; 518(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 23274654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial organization of the transcriptional regulatory network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Sun DQ; Tian L; Ma BG
    FEBS Lett; 2019 Apr; 593(8):876-884. PubMed ID: 30908624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating transcriptional and protein interaction networks to prioritize condition-specific master regulators.
    Padi M; Quackenbush J
    BMC Syst Biol; 2015 Nov; 9():80. PubMed ID: 26576632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AVID: an integrative framework for discovering functional relationships among proteins.
    Jiang T; Keating AE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 6():136. PubMed ID: 15929793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolutionary conservation and over-representation of functionally enriched network patterns in the yeast regulatory network.
    Meshi O; Shlomi T; Ruppin E
    BMC Syst Biol; 2007 Jan; 1():1. PubMed ID: 17408505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.