These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30422045)

  • 1. Neuropsychological tests of the future: How do we get there from here?
    Bilder RM; Reise SP
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):220-245. PubMed ID: 30422045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures.
    Teresi JA; Kleinman M; Ocepek-Welikson K
    Stat Med; 2000 Jun 15-30; 19(11-12):1651-83. PubMed ID: 10844726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rationale and Design of the National Neuropsychology Network.
    Loring DW; Bauer RM; Cavanagh L; Drane DL; Enriquez KD; Reise SP; Shih K; Umfleet LG; Wahlstrom D; Whelan F; Widaman KF; Bilder RM;
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2022 Jan; 28(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 33658102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modern psychometrics applied in rheumatology--a systematic review.
    Siemons L; Ten Klooster PM; Taal E; Glas CA; Van de Laar MA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Oct; 13():216. PubMed ID: 23114105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pediatric Perceived Cognitive Functioning: Psychometric Properties and Normative Data of the Dutch Item Bank and Short Form.
    Marchal JP; de Vries M; Conijn J; Rietman AB; IJsselstijn H; Tibboel D; Haverman L; Maurice-Stam H; Oostrom KJ; Grootenhuis MA
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Sep; 25(8):845-856. PubMed ID: 31179957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parametric model measurement: reframing traditional measurement ideas in neuropsychological practice and research.
    Brown GG; Thomas ML; Patt V
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017; 31(6-7):1047-1072. PubMed ID: 28617067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advances in applications of item response theory to clinical assessment.
    Thomas ML
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1442-1455. PubMed ID: 30869966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving precision in neuropsychological assessment: Bridging the gap between classic paper-and-pencil tests and paradigms from cognitive neuroscience.
    Kessels RPC
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):357-368. PubMed ID: 30394172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review.
    Thomas ML
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 20644081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach. Application to the Mini-Mental State Examination.
    Orlando Edelen MO; Thissen D; Teresi JA; Kleinman M; Ocepek-Welikson K
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S134-42. PubMed ID: 17060820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A signal detection-item response theory model for evaluating neuropsychological measures.
    Thomas ML; Brown GG; Gur RC; Moore TM; Patt VM; Risbrough VB; Baker DG
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 Oct; 40(8):745-760. PubMed ID: 29402152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuropsychology 3.0: evidence-based science and practice.
    Bilder RM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2011 Jan; 17(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 21092355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The case for an international patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) initiative.
    Alonso J; Bartlett SJ; Rose M; Aaronson NK; Chaplin JE; Efficace F; Leplège A; Lu A; Tulsky DS; Raat H; Ravens-Sieberer U; Revicki D; Terwee CB; Valderas JM; Cella D; Forrest CB;
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2013 Dec; 11():210. PubMed ID: 24359143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why are neuropsychologists so reluctant to embrace modern assessment techniques?
    Schmand B
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 30882285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spanish and English Neuropsychological Assessment Scales (SENAS): further development and psychometric characteristics.
    Mungas D; Reed BR; Crane PK; Haan MN; González H
    Psychol Assess; 2004 Dec; 16(4):347-59. PubMed ID: 15584794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neuropsychology in Japan: history, current challenges, and future prospects.
    Sakamoto M
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2016 Nov; 30(8):1278-1295. PubMed ID: 27685253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction to the special issue: Are modern neuropsychological assessment methods really "modern"? Reflections on the current neuropsychological test armamentarium.
    Marcopulos B; Łojek E
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):187-199. PubMed ID: 30760098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential item functioning on the Mini-Mental State Examination. An application of the Mantel-Haenszel and standardization procedures.
    Dorans NJ; Kulick E
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S107-14. PubMed ID: 17060817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Modular Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Electronic Assessment and Treatment Monitoring: Web-Based Development and Psychometric Validation of Core Thrive Items.
    Wicks P; McCaffrey S; Goodwin K; Black R; Hoole M; Heywood J
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):e12075. PubMed ID: 30681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.