These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users. Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 25658746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peripheral and Central Contributions to Cortical Responses in Cochlear Implant Users. Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):430-40. PubMed ID: 25658747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the Relationship Between Pitch Perception and Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users. Arslan NO; Luo X J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 23(6):875-887. PubMed ID: 36329369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the relationship between neural health measures and speech performance with simultaneous electric stimulation in cochlear implant listeners. Langner F; Arenberg JG; Büchner A; Nogueira W PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261295. PubMed ID: 34898654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels. Bierer JA; Nye AD Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex. Middlebrooks JC J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 18450583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners. Gaudrain E; Deeks JM; Carlyon RP J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 18(2):387-397. PubMed ID: 27687041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effect of Phantom Stimulation and Pseudomonophasic Pulse Shapes on Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant Listeners. Lamping W; Deeks JM; Marozeau J; Carlyon RP J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 21(6):511-526. PubMed ID: 32804337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced Pitch Discrimination for Cochlear Implant Users with a New Haptic Neuroprosthetic. Fletcher MD; Thini N; Perry SW Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10354. PubMed ID: 32587354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition. Garadat SN; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4030-41. PubMed ID: 22559376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in an Animal Model: Psychophysics and Scalp Recordings : Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Cat. Richardson ML; Guérit F; Gransier R; Wouters J; Carlyon RP; Middlebrooks JC J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 23(4):491-512. PubMed ID: 35668206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants. Saoji AA; Landsberger DM; Padilla M; Litvak LM Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():109-16. PubMed ID: 23299125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]