These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30424512)
1. Identifying Free-Living Physical Activities Using Lab-Based Models with Wearable Accelerometers. Dutta A; Ma O; Toledo M; Pregonero AF; Ainsworth BE; Buman MP; Bliss DW Sensors (Basel); 2018 Nov; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 30424512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer. Montoye AHK; Westgate BS; Fonley MR; Pfeiffer KA J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 May; 124(5):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29369742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification. Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Staudenmayer J; Lanckriet G Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 26673126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data. Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Gomersall SR; Clark B; Trost SG J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 27372275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors. Attal F; Mohammed S; Dedabrishvili M; Chamroukhi F; Oukhellou L; Amirat Y Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 15(12):31314-38. PubMed ID: 26690450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X. Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracting aerobic system dynamics during unsupervised activities of daily living using wearable sensor machine learning models. Beltrame T; Amelard R; Wong A; Hughson RL J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 Feb; 124(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 28596271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wrist accelerometer shape feature derivation methods for assessing activities of daily living. Kheirkhahan M; Chakraborty A; Wanigatunga AA; Corbett DB; Manini TM; Ranka S BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Dec; 18(Suppl 4):124. PubMed ID: 30537957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age Differences in Estimating Physical Activity by Wrist Accelerometry Using Machine Learning. Mardini MT; Bai C; Wanigatunga AA; Saldana S; Casanova R; Manini TM Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34065906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Objective Assessment of Physical Activity: Classifiers for Public Health. Kerr J; Patterson RE; Ellis K; Godbole S; Johnson E; Lanckriet G; Staudenmayer J Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 27089222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning algorithms can classify outdoor terrain types during running using accelerometry data. Dixon PC; Schütte KH; Vanwanseele B; Jacobs JV; Dennerlein JT; Schiffman JM; Fournier PA; Hu B Gait Posture; 2019 Oct; 74():176-181. PubMed ID: 31539798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wrist-worn triaxial accelerometry predicts the energy expenditure of non-vigorous daily physical activities. Sirichana W; Dolezal BA; Neufeld EV; Wang X; Cooper CB J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Aug; 20(8):761-765. PubMed ID: 28159535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep Learning to Predict Energy Expenditure and Activity Intensity in Free Living Conditions using Wrist-specific Accelerometry. Nawaratne R; Alahakoon D; De Silva D; O'Halloran PD; Montoye AH; Staley K; Nicholson M; Kingsley MI J Sports Sci; 2021 Mar; 39(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 33121379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Applying Multivariate Segmentation Methods to Human Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors' Data. Li K; Habre R; Deng H; Urman R; Morrison J; Gilliland FD; Ambite JL; Stripelis D; Chiang YY; Lin Y; Bui AA; King C; Hosseini A; Vliet EV; Sarrafzadeh M; Eckel SP JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e11201. PubMed ID: 30730297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AccNet24: A deep learning framework for classifying 24-hour activity behaviours from wrist-worn accelerometer data under free-living environments. Farrahi V; Muhammad U; Rostami M; Oussalah M Int J Med Inform; 2023 Apr; 172():105004. PubMed ID: 36724729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Dual-Accelerometer System for Classifying Physical Activity in Children and Adults. Stewart T; Narayanan A; Hedayatrad L; Neville J; Mackay L; Duncan S Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Dec; 50(12):2595-2602. PubMed ID: 30048411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Lean and Performant Hierarchical Model for Human Activity Recognition Using Body-Mounted Sensors. Debache I; Jeantet L; Chevallier D; Bergouignan A; Sueur C Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 32486068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of Activity Classification Algorithms in Free-Living Older Adults. Sasaki JE; Hickey AM; Staudenmayer JW; John D; Kent JA; Freedson PS Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 26673129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibration of GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points for the assessment of physical activity intensity of preschool aged children. Roscoe CMP; James RS; Duncan MJ Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 176(8):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 28674825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]